Moon Hoax

We probably missed and landed on Mars but did not know it.

 

You need a new buddy.

That the moon landings were faked is so far out of the realm of possibility that it makes the mind spin. Hell, we still don't have good enough special effects to fake the photodocumentation that we have from the 60's.

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(saechaka @ Aug 28 2006, 04:22 PM) [snapback]310794[/snapback]</div>

Major hoax proponents as listed on wikipedia . . .
Bill Kaysing
Bart Sibrel
William Brian
David Percy
Ralph Rene
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon_landing_hoax

. . . not one a Nobel winner. Don't ayah think an Nobel Laureate would be mentioned?
. . . or is that a conspiracy too?

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Sufferin' Prius Envy @ Aug 28 2006, 05:15 PM) [snapback]310838[/snapback]</div>

Hmmm. I'm thinking that this hoax thing might be... a hoax!

 

Does he keep his coffee in the refrigerator in a metal canister with a combination lock?

Is he obsessed with Julia Roberts?

Does he wear a tin foil beanie?

Does that answer your question?

 

My favorite part was the inserted advertisement for "Moon's Finest Florist"

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(saechaka @ Aug 28 2006, 09:35 PM) [snapback]310972[/snapback]</div>

What? The sequel??? :huh:
Oh, yeah, that'll convince them. :lol: :lol: :lol:

 

The problem is that the conspiracy theorists will go to great lengths to raise questions about shadows ("they are going different ways .... there must be more than one light source, therefore its in a studio!"), the way things move ("the flag is jiggling, and there's no air on the moon!") and tales of complicity by NASA as told to a cousin of the friend of a Nobel Prize nominee.

Here's the basic precept, and you can use it for conspiracy theorists as well as the Creationists: Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. Don't fall for the pointed-question-as-proof fallacy. A question is not proof.

Your friend in the IT department may know a lot about technical issues, but he knows nothing about common sense and science. He is a functional idiot who accepts a lie because it is "entertaining" and feeds his insecurity about his place in the world by believing tales of Dragons and demons ... only in the guise of big powerful organizations or diabolical secret societies.

It is not open minded to entertain these guys, it is lunacy.

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(saechaka @ Aug 28 2006, 10:06 PM) [snapback]310982[/snapback]</div>

I believe the LEM and the Rover had there own cameras operated by Remote Control that also took pictures.
Reference . . . Think of the best special effects movies that you have ever seen. Now think of the inconsistencies and visual errors that even the casual and uninformed audience can see in these films. Now think back to 1969 and the movies that were made then. Could we have produced such fakery that it would not only stand up to the scrutiny of a 1969 audience, but also a whole generation of scientists familiar with the geologic study of celestial bodies? In fact, the only ones to find fault in this record is a small "cottage industry" group of TMLWFers

http://pirlwww.lpl.arizona.edu/~jscotti/NOT_faked/

Wildkow

p.s. My 2 cents which ain't worth a plug nickle. :huh:

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(saechaka @ Aug 28 2006, 10:06 PM) [snapback]310982[/snapback]</div>

Jack White has been throwing crap at the wall hoping something will stick for quite a while. When he's proved wrong, he simply removes that evidence and comes up with some other load of crap to throw. Then he has to gall to say "I never said it was fake". See the 11 page forum post debunking his earlier claims at http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.ph...st=0#entry51880

Then visit this archive of Bad Astronomy postings: http://www.bautforum.com/archive/index.php/f-19.html There's 11 pages of 250 forum links each debunking conspiracy theories about astronomy.

I can easily shoot more than a picture a minute ... shutter speed is 1/30 of a second, and my fingers work faster than one press a minute, even if I'm wearing gloves. Some of the shots were from cameras mounted on the suit, so it wasn't a case of the astronaut having to set up the camera each time to take a shot.

If you're inclined to believe fairy tales, at least pick up something like the great "cover up by the authorities" in the last century that guys you would think are smart held ... like Sherlock Holmes author Arthur Canon Doyle ... who believed in fairies. At least THEY are cute and sexy like Tinkerbelle.

 

The best proof that the moon landings were real was provided by the Soviet Union.

If the moon landing weren't real, wouldn't they - the other superpower, the ones in which we were in competition with to reach the moon first - have the technical wherewithal to gather all the proof needed to blow any moon landing hoax wide open?

Did they yell, “Fake!�

No . . . they congratulated us.

Why would they keep quiet about a hoax? They didn't keep quiet about a hoax, because there was no hoax.

PERIOD!

End of story.

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(saechaka @ Aug 28 2006, 06:22 PM) [snapback]310794[/snapback]</div>

Is he a member of the Flat Earth Society?

 

You might want to see the 1978 movie Capricorn One, starring O.J. Simpson.
(it's a very bad movie, but it shows that this theory is not new)

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0077294/ (IMDB shows an extensive trailer)

Solar Hydro

P.S. Why doesn't anyone mention that NASA admitted a couple of weeks ago to having 'misplaced' the 'original moon landing tapes'?

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Solar Hydro @ Aug 29 2006, 03:20 AM) [snapback]311029[/snapback]</div>

Shhhh. . . [attachmentid=4678]

 

Forget about the moon landings. I'm interested in who killed the Fish Carburetor. If my Prius got one of these, and one of those fuel line magnets, I bet I could see 100MPG easy.

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Sufferin' Prius Envy @ Aug 29 2006, 02:00 AM) [snapback]311020[/snapback]</div>

Besides that, we have all this moon stuff ... rocks, and especially dust. Hundreds of pounds of it.

The best proof is the fact that only LUNAtics believe it was a hoax.

The latin root of the word is appropos, I'm afraid.

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(darelldd @ Aug 28 2006, 08:15 PM) [snapback]310837[/snapback]</div>

OMG! :lol: The You need a new buddy statement caused coffee to be sprayed on the monitor, That was priceless!!! :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

And it was True <_<

www.hoaxbusters.com