1. Attachments are working again! Check out this thread for more details and to report any other bugs.

Obama top priority: to focus America on Science, Genetic Research and Global Warming

Discussion in 'Environmental Discussion' started by Rybold, Dec 20, 2008.

  1. Rybold

    Rybold globally warmed member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2008
    2,760
    320
    3
    Location:
    Southern California
    Vehicle:
    Other Non-Hybrid
    "WASHINGTON (AFP) – President-elect Barack Obama on Saturday signaled climate change and genetic research will be among his top priorities when he takes office as he named White House science and technology advisers."

    Article... Obama signals break with Bush in new science team - Yahoo! News
     
  2. galaxee

    galaxee mostly benevolent

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2005
    9,810
    464
    0
    Location:
    MD
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    ok, now let's see how long it takes to rebuild budgets for research funding.
     
  3. FL_Prius_Driver

    FL_Prius_Driver Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2007
    4,319
    1,527
    0
    Location:
    Tampa Bay
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    I
    Actually, one of the more important things that should be done by the exective branch is to remove the excess bureaucracy of overwhelming proposals, and non-research paperwork.
     
  4. galaxee

    galaxee mostly benevolent

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2005
    9,810
    464
    0
    Location:
    MD
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    i'm not sure exactly what you're referring to. the major research vehicle, the R01 grant, is set to drop to a (i think) 10-page proposal limit soon. i have submitted a couple of ~10 page fellowship applications and while they suck, it is important to have a thoroughly developed plan available for review and criticism by the reviewers- this is how they decide scientific merit for funding. the associated paperwork isn't much in comparison to the work involved in developing the actual proposal.

    imo the major problem here is that applications are being funded in the 20-30% range. new applications are even sadder- the stat i found for 2006 was a whopping 9%! good science is not being funded, promising young investigators are not being given the chance to even enter the arena, find other science careers instead, and my generation of academic science will be far smaller as a result.
     
  5. FL_Prius_Driver

    FL_Prius_Driver Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2007
    4,319
    1,527
    0
    Location:
    Tampa Bay
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    I
    Actually, you described it indirectly. For someone to get funded, they have to submit many, many proposals (yet nobody has many different specialties that are totally independent, so all those proposals are variations on a theme). Then one that is awarded is only good for the years covered before the cycle repeats. After looking at the total picture of how much time is spend writing to get funding and how much time is spend doing the actual science, it really is inefficient.