1. Attachments are working again! Check out this thread for more details and to report any other bugs.

PV costs poised to drop %40 by 2010

Discussion in 'Environmental Discussion' started by tripp, May 23, 2007.

  1. tripp

    tripp Which it's a 'ybrid, ain't it?

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2005
    4,717
    79
    0
    Location:
    Denver, CO
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    There are 3 things driving the expected drop in PV prices over the next couple of years. First, manufacturers are ramping up production of polycrystalline silicon as fast as they can. Second, because of the current supply constraint companies have found and developed a variety of ways of reducing the amount and quality of silicon required in PV cells. Finally, China has gotten into the game and can lower cost because of a cheaper (for now) labor force.

    This is, of course, brilliant news.

    Full Article
     
    #1 tripp, May 23, 2007
  2. burritos

    burritos Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2006
    4,946
    252
    0
    Location:
    California
    Vehicle:
    2006 Prius
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(tripp @ May 23 2007, 10:42 AM) [snapback]448200[/snapback]</div>
    Which is more likely to occur? This 40% cost(thus price) reduction in PVs, or the the "Volt" coming to fruition(by 2010)?
     
    #2 burritos, May 23, 2007
  3. Tideland Prius

    Tideland Prius Moderator of the North
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2004
    44,907
    16,128
    41
    Location:
    Canada
    Vehicle:
    Other Non-Hybrid
    Model:
    N/A
    The former... unless GM builds the VOLT in China.
     
    #3 Tideland Prius, May 23, 2007
  4. chogan

    chogan New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2006
    590
    0
    0
    Location:
    Vienna, VA
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(tripp @ May 23 2007, 11:42 AM) [snapback]448200[/snapback]</div>
    Interesting article. It didn't even mention Nanosolar's offset-printing technology that doesn't use silicon. Which is an independent reason to expect cheaper solar cells soon. Nanosolar claimed costs at 1/10th of prevailing levels ($0.25 per peak watt vs $2.50 currently), and claimed some astounding output from the factory they are building in Califonia (as in, it will expand total worldwide solar cell output by one-quarter). If they ever manage to get their plant up and running, that could hasten this along.
     
    #4 chogan, May 24, 2007
(You must log in or sign up to post here.)