1. Attachments are working again! Check out this thread for more details and to report any other bugs.

Relationship of Regenerative Braking Intensity VS. Efficiency - What is best?

Discussion in 'Gen 3 Prius Technical Discussion' started by erev, Aug 26, 2015.

  1. erev

    erev Junior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2009
    7
    1
    0
    Location:
    Germany
    Vehicle:
    2007 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    Hello everyone,

    as I could not find this figure up to now - perhaps someone can give me a first hint. Thank you very much!

    Let's assume I drive 30 mph (48 kmh) and I want do decelerate to 10 mph (16 kmh) with regenerative braking (flat terrain, no curvature, good road surface, no other traffic).
    [Edit after 1st reply]: Let's assume I do not have enough space to use "neutral glide" (i.e. without using any regenerative braking) alone - i.e. I have at least to use the regen when I step off the gas pedal to decelerate to 10mph in time.

    Does it make any difference for energy efficiency (i.e., total khw regenerated during this deceleration) which of the following strategies I use:
    a) Only step from the gas pedal and wait until if have reached 10 mph (i.e. only weak "gas-pedal regen")
    b) step from gas pedal and only very slightly touch brake pedal to have just a bit more regen than when only using strategy (a)
    c) step from gas pedal and moderately step on brake pedal so that I use about 50% of possible regen intensity
    d) step from gas pedal and step on brake pedal so that I use the maximum possible regen intensity (of course with avoiding going over the regen-limit).

    Thank you very much for your viewpoints on this!

    Best regards,
    EREV
     
    #1 erev, Aug 26, 2015
    Last edited: Aug 26, 2015
  2. bisco

    bisco cookie crumbler

    Joined:
    May 11, 2005
    107,571
    48,862
    0
    Location:
    boston
    Vehicle:
    2012 Prius Plug-in
    Model:
    Plug-in Base
    e) let off gas pedal just enough to glide, or use neutral.
     
  3. Mendel Leisk

    Mendel Leisk Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2010
    54,469
    38,103
    80
    Location:
    Greater Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    Touring
    Whenever possible I would use "a", ie: coast down to the lower speed without touching the brake. For that reason I tend to leave generous following distance to the cars ahead. I'm by no means sure this is the best option, but it seems to me any time you touch the brakes you're throwing away inertial impetus.
     
  4. erev

    erev Junior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2009
    7
    1
    0
    Location:
    Germany
    Vehicle:
    2007 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    @bisco: You got me :)
    Indeed - this was an error in my scenario-description. I wanted to say "This is a situation where I cannot use "neutral glide" alone (i.e. I do not have enough space). I edited my first post accordingly.
    Thank you for the extremely quick answer and for spotting this mistake!
    Best
    EREV

    @Mendel Leisk: Thank you! Okay - so is it just a "feeling" or did you experience it to be best (compared to the others) - for example in terms of fuel consumption (under comparable conditions).
     
    #4 erev, Aug 26, 2015
    Last edited: Aug 26, 2015
    bisco likes this.
  5. David Beale

    David Beale Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2006
    5,963
    1,979
    0
    Location:
    Edmonton Alberta
    Vehicle:
    2012 Prius
    High current regen. can be cancelled by the car (due usually to battery heat, but also battery charge getting high). Low current regen. will not overheat the battery, but can also get the charge high. Overall, low current regen. is most likely to succeed in getting the most charge in the battery as it is less likely to cause the issues mentioned. The efficiency vs charge current is mostly the same, but the other factors can make a big difference.

    DO keep in mind that, while better than NOT recharging by regen., the charge/discharge cycle of the battery is -at best- about 50% efficient overall. So avoiding it entirely is -more- efficient, as already mentioned. But, if it is required in driving, it is energy that other cars throw away, and it contributes to the overall efficiency of the Prius.
     
    Robert Holt, Vman455 and gdanner like this.
  6. erev

    erev Junior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2009
    7
    1
    0
    Location:
    Germany
    Vehicle:
    2007 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    @David Beale: Thank you!
    [1] Regarding "high current regen can be cancelled" - okay this is a good decision-relevant criterion - i.e. it is more a "likelihood-argument" of "if you want to be safe (i.e. sure to succeed) than use low current regen"
    [2] Regarding "not recharging is best": Yes, this is clear to me. My question is just for the case were one did not manage to start "neutral glide" early enough.


    @All: So lets add another condition to my scenario description: Let's assume perfect conditions where there is no unusual limit in regen capacity (battery is not hot or (nearly) full).
    For these best conditions: Would there be a way to decide between option a to d?
    Has someone maybe heard of e.g. a graph where efficiency of the generator in the prius is displayed - or something similiar?
    Thank you!

    Best
    EREV
     
  7. KyleSTL

    KyleSTL Junior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2014
    79
    19
    0
    Vehicle:
    2013 Prius
    Model:
    Three
    Why is that? I have heard that statement multiple times, but don't really understand the underlying causes of this inefficiency. I'd imagine the inverter is highly efficient (90%+) and modern motors are highly efficient (85%+). Why does over half the energy get wasted and not recovered?
     
  8. CR94

    CR94 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2014
    2,642
    1,133
    0
    Location:
    Northwestern S.C.
    Vehicle:
    2011 Prius
    Model:
    Two
    Because there are so many stages of energy conversion getting energy from wheels to motor to inverter into the battery, then back out of battery to inverter to motor to wheels. There are losses at each conversion. Even if (to oversimplify) each stage is 90% efficient, that's .9×.9×.9×.9×.9×.9×.9=43%
     
    #8 CR94, Aug 26, 2015
    Last edited: Aug 26, 2015
  9. CR94

    CR94 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2014
    2,642
    1,133
    0
    Location:
    Northwestern S.C.
    Vehicle:
    2011 Prius
    Model:
    Two
    the premise of this hypothetical question seems a little confused, in that the different options would use very different amounts of space, which is supposedly limited to some fixed distance. Aside from that, option "d" would put the most energy into the battery, IF the relevant components of the car were all equally efficient at every level of regeneration braking. The reason is that option "d" would theoretically minimize loss of energy to aerodynamic drag. The difference would be small, though. I'd favor option "a," in the real world, though, because it puts less stress on the components.
     
  10. David Beale

    David Beale Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2006
    5,963
    1,979
    0
    Location:
    Edmonton Alberta
    Vehicle:
    2012 Prius
    Batteries are not efficient when charging. At best, 80%, typically less than that. I hear the LiIon ones are better, but I have little experience with them. Now, it's difficult to measure, but when a NiMH battery is discharged it is also not efficient. It's better than when under charge, but only a little better.
    All numbers I use are -approximate-. They are close, but only that.

    So, you apply the brake lightly to charge the NiMH battery (the HSD does so to about 80% capacity, then stops - I'll explain why at the bottom) - you loose about 5% in the MG, another 5% in the inverter and 20% in the battery. Remember, these numbers are cumulative. That is, you charge the battery with only 90.25% of the energy and only retain, in the battery, 80% of that, or 72.2% of the energy you started with.

    At the next light or uphill or whatever, the HSD draws energy from the battery to power the car. It only gets out about 85%, the rest is lost to heat. This then goes into the inverter (to convert the approx. 200V to approx. 350V three phase) and you end up with a further loss of 5%, then this goes to the MG which also looses about 5%. Result, you get 76.7% of the energy from the battery to the wheels.

    Overall, you get 55.4% of the energy you started with (multiply the 72.2% in by the 76.7% out). I'm overusing the decimal point here, (too may significant figures ;) ), but whatever. There are other losses in the cables (battery in rear, MG up front) and connections.
    So we "round off" to 50%. Temperature will also have an effect (or is it an affect).

    So, why does the HSD operate the NiMH battery over such a limited capacity range? (it's used from about 30% to about 80%).

    First, when charging, a NiMH battery is moderately efficient, -UNTIL- you reach 80% charge. It then converts a lot of the charging current to heat. This has been used for years to detect the 80% charge point and switch to "trickle charge" in uses such as hand-held two way radios. This effect is probably NOT the main reason however.

    Remember, the "traction battery" is a series connection of 168 NiMH cells, each one slightly different, even though they are "matched". So, when you discharge the battery, -one- cell will have the lowest capacity of the bunch, and if you continued to discharge to get close to full discharge that one cell would run out before the others. Because they are series connected, that one cell would be "reverse charged" by the current from the other cells. This is -death- for NiMH cells! So we avoid it by stopping at 30%!

    When you charge the traction battery and try to get to 100%, that one cell will end up being overcharged. It will convert that charge current totally to heat, overheat, and vent (don't let the battery manufacturers fool you, NO cell is -ever- fully "sealed". If they didn't have a vent of some kind they would burst)! This venting will cause that cell to loose electrolyte (or water if you are lucky), but either way loss of electrolyte/water will drop it's capacity some more. You end up with a battery with a short life! So we avoid that by limiting the charge to 80% capacity.

    Sorry, it's a long explanation, rather technical, and not totally accurate, but close enough for our use here.
     
  11. erev

    erev Junior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2009
    7
    1
    0
    Location:
    Germany
    Vehicle:
    2007 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    @David Beale: Thank you for this extensive explanation!

    @CR94: Yes, the scenario is a bit artificial - your are right. Yet, your sentence "IF the relevant components of the car were all equally efficient at every level of regeneration braking" gets the point. This is the core of my questions:
    Are the components of the Prius all equally efficient at every level of regeneration braking? (Under best conditions - i.e., the regenerative braking system is not currently limited by heat or a full battery)
     
  12. CR94

    CR94 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2014
    2,642
    1,133
    0
    Location:
    Northwestern S.C.
    Vehicle:
    2011 Prius
    Model:
    Two
    The battery is probably happier and more efficient when the charge current is lowest, as in your option "a." The wiring definitely is. I'm not sure about the other relevant components.

    What's more important is that option "a" provides the most distance, if you have space to use it safely, therefore is most efficient overall, even if it puts slightly less energy into the battery. It's better to spend your valuable kinetic energy on keeping the wheels turning than on charging the battery.
     
  13. macman408

    macman408 Electron Guidance Counselor

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2010
    1,179
    365
    1
    Location:
    California
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    V
    Many years ago here, it was cited that either C or D would be your best option; someone apparently tested it out on a GenII Prius, and found that regen had some amount of fixed energy cost, plus efficiency peaked at higher amounts of regen.
     
  14. econo-one

    econo-one Junior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2016
    12
    5
    0
    Location:
    Lake Tahoe, Nevada
    Vehicle:
    2016 Prius
    Model:
    Two
    If what you say is true, then what is to be gained by the "pulse and coast" scenario that is so frequently promoted in these forums? Wouldn't the most efficient strategy be to maintain a steady throttle--at least, while driving in steadily moving traffic?
     
  15. CR94

    CR94 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2014
    2,642
    1,133
    0
    Location:
    Northwestern S.C.
    Vehicle:
    2011 Prius
    Model:
    Two
    Not necessarily, because the "pulse and coast scenario" done optimally does not involve regenerative braking and the associated energy conversion losses. During the coasting phase, spending stored kinetic (or potential) energy directly on keeping the wheels turning is a lot more efficient than spending it on charging the battery, then withdrawing from the battery to turn the wheels---conditions permitting, of course.

    That said, the "pulse and coast scenario" works best at fairly low speeds when there's no traffic to deal with, or when you can take advantage of hills. On flats in the "steadily moving traffic" you mentioned, holding the accelerator pedal steady with engine running continuously is likely to be more practical, safer---and more efficient too if the speed is highish.
     
  16. econo-one

    econo-one Junior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2016
    12
    5
    0
    Location:
    Lake Tahoe, Nevada
    Vehicle:
    2016 Prius
    Model:
    Two
    CR94--Thanks for your reply. I can see where I was confused about just how to benefit from "pulse and coast". I now understand that the goal is to keep the battery out of the equation as much as possible.
     
    CR94 likes this.
  17. Piotrus Pan

    Piotrus Pan Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2014
    126
    46
    0
    Location:
    Luxembourg
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    III
    David Beale "charging efficiency of nickel metal hydride batteries is typically 66%".
    NiMH battery technology, how to charge Nickel Metal Hydride
    Batteries tutorial for design engineers, as well as NiMH chargers.

    Nickel–metal hydride battery - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    I got some reading time for you KyleSTL. If you're interested of course.
    Simplified efficiency problems:
    http://windstreampower.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/EFFICIENCY.pdf

    This might be interesting for everyone.
    Extensive 2010 Prius motor test:
    https://info.ornl.gov/sites/publications/files/Pub26762.pdf
    Page 68 (Voltage generation), 71 (Summary).
    In short "Motor efficiency measurements reached 96% are above 90% for a great portion of the operation range".
     
    Robert Holt likes this.
  18. Robert Holt

    Robert Holt Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2013
    1,313
    888
    0
    Vehicle:
    2012 Prius
    Model:
    Three
    "...will also have an effect (or is it an affect)."
    The temperature will only have an effect on the results unless it gets angry with you for some completely incomprehensible reason, or maybe the temperature gets hot and bothered because it's too sunny that day, or maybe it gives you the cold shoulder because it's winter and you don't have the car's heat on. Oh, wait, we're not talking about my DW, are we?
     
    Raytheeagle likes this.
  19. Piotrus Pan

    Piotrus Pan Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2014
    126
    46
    0
    Location:
    Luxembourg
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    III
    Isn't the Hybrid System supposed to stop charging when the battery reaches 80% or even 60%? And I don't mean 80% of the 8 bar meter, I mean the overall capacity.
    I think when the 8 bar meter shows full on the dash in reality the battery is at 80% or 60%.
     
  20. Maarten28

    Maarten28 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2014
    414
    222
    1
    Location:
    Netherlands
    Vehicle:
    2011 Prius
    Model:
    Three
    Yes, but he is not claiming the hybrid system will charge to 100%. He is explaining what would happen if it would be charged to 100%.