1. Attachments are working again! Check out this thread for more details and to report any other bugs.

Supernova observation in 'real time'

Discussion in 'Environmental Discussion' started by bwilson4web, Jan 7, 2022.

  1. bwilson4web

    bwilson4web BMW i3 and Model 3

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2005
    27,373
    15,513
    0
    Location:
    Huntsville AL
    Vehicle:
    2018 Tesla Model 3
    Model:
    Prime Plus
    Source: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/ac3f3a

    We present panchromatic observations and modeling of supernova (SN) 2020tlf, the first normal Type II-P/L SN with confirmed precursor emission, as detected by the Young Supernova Experiment transient survey. Pre-SN activity was detected in riz-bands at −130 days and persisted at relatively constant flux until first light. Soon after discovery, "flash" spectroscopy of SN 2020tlf revealed narrow, symmetric emission lines that resulted from the photoionization of circumstellar material (CSM) shed in progenitor mass-loss episodes before explosion. Surprisingly, this novel display of pre-SN emission and associated mass loss occurred in a red supergiant (RSG) progenitor with zero-age main-sequence mass of only 10–12 M⊙, as inferred from nebular spectra. Modeling of the light curve and multi-epoch spectra with the non-LTE radiative-transfer code CMFGEN and radiation-hydrodynamical code HERACLES suggests a dense CSM limited to r ≈ 1015 cm, and mass-loss rate of 10−2 M⊙ yr−1. The luminous light-curve plateau and persistent blue excess indicates an extended progenitor, compatible with an RSG model with R⋆ = 1100 R⊙. Limits on the shock-powered X-ray and radio luminosity are consistent with model conclusions and suggest a CSM density of ρ < 2 × 10−16 g cm−3 for distances from the progenitor star of r ≈ 5 × 1015 cm, as well as a mass-loss rate of $\dot{M}\lt 1.3\times {10}^{-5}\,{M}_{\odot }\,{\mathrm{yr}}^{-1}$ at larger distances. A promising power source for the observed precursor emission is the ejection of stellar material following energy disposition into the stellar envelope as a result of gravity waves emitted during either neon/oxygen burning or a nuclear flash from silicon combustion.

    Awesome:
    upload_2022-1-7_2-35-35.png

    Bob Wilson
     
    #1 bwilson4web, Jan 7, 2022
    Last edited: Jan 7, 2022
  2. tochatihu

    tochatihu Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2004
    9,045
    3,528
    0
    Location:
    Kunming Yunnan China
    Vehicle:
    2001 Prius
    "mass-loss rate of 10−2 M⊙ yr−1. " Is dense astro speak appropriate for that setting. It lacks a lot of gee whiz.

    It is equivalent to blowing off the earth's mass every 2.6 hours. Or 100 billion times faster than the sun is losing mass. Could convert it to number of blue whales per second, but that might veer too far towards opposite extreme of gee whiz.

    ==
    The neat thing about have modern telescopes is having several of each kind, dispersed, with agility and good communications. So, when something interesting happens, dynamic observations can continue as earth rotates, astronomers first seeing it confront sunrise, and need to put their lens cap back on.
     
    #2 tochatihu, Jan 7, 2022
    Last edited: Jan 7, 2022