1. Attachments are working again! Check out this thread for more details and to report any other bugs.

The definitive AGW denial treatise

Discussion in 'Fred's House of Pancakes' started by icarus, Apr 15, 2010.

  1. icarus

    icarus Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2007
    4,884
    976
    0
    Location:
    earth
    Vehicle:
    2007 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    I have come across what can only be described as the definitive proof positive that AGW is false! I have changed my long held beliefs by reading and finally understanding this. I challenge everyone else to do the same.

    http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/parity.pdf

    I expect you AGW believers to explain,, in detail where they think the study is flawed!


    Icarus

    PS. This link is even clearer:

    http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2
     
  2. hyo silver

    hyo silver Awaaaaay

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2005
    15,232
    1,562
    0
    Location:
    off into the sunset
    Vehicle:
    2004 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    I like the conclusion. After all that excessively complicated technical verbage, (aka 'big words') they say: 'somebody should check.' :)
     
  3. LRKingII

    LRKingII New Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2009
    679
    132
    0
    Location:
    Idaho
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    III
    Actually it says "look"
     
  4. icarus

    icarus Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2007
    4,884
    976
    0
    Location:
    earth
    Vehicle:
    2007 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    And to think I have spent all this time trying to get rectabular conditions to transmogrify. I should have understood that cobaqular thyristors would not register properly,,,

    Silly me!
     
  5. hyo silver

    hyo silver Awaaaaay

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2005
    15,232
    1,562
    0
    Location:
    off into the sunset
    Vehicle:
    2004 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    Well of course. I mean, if you'd only read the thing, you'd know that "biological homochirality was universally biased by residual chiral vacuum background" means 'you only see what you're looking for' :D

    And yes, it says 'look', not 'check'. Oops.