1. Attachments are working again! Check out this thread for more details and to report any other bugs.

Warp Stealth

Discussion in 'Gen 2 Prius Fuel Economy' started by hobbit, May 21, 2006.

  1. hobbit

    hobbit Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2005
    4,089
    468
    0
    Location:
    Bahstahn
    Vehicle:
    2004 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    I am looking for serious feedback on this document:
    http://techno-fandom.org/~hobbit/cars/warpstealth.html
    which lays it all out about feathering at higher speeds above
    41 mph. I want to try and get this material into widespread
    knowledge bases once it's confirmed and corrected, so that people
    understand the advantages and how to play the game. I would also
    appreciate help in the following areas:
    .
    .. if it works in Classics
    .. if someone with CAN-View can confirm the VVTi stuff
    .
    This is along the same lines as "b-mode.html" in the same directory;
    to inform the folks newer to the Prius about some of the wonderful
    engineering subtleties in what they're driving.
    .
    _H*
     
  2. galaxee

    galaxee mostly benevolent

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2005
    9,810
    465
    0
    Location:
    MD
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    whoa, that's some in depth stuff. i'll have to get back to it after tuesday sometime and really go through it.

    thanks for putting all this info out there.
     
  3. benighted

    benighted New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2005
    530
    1
    0
    Location:
    Westport, WA
    I think some who have driven bot classics and Gen2 have said that it is easier to glide in a 04+ than a classic.
     
  4. EricGo

    EricGo New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2005
    1,805
    0
    0
    Location:
    Albuquerque, NM (SouthWest US)
    Well written !!

    Is it really 2 kW to spin the engine in warp ? I was thinking more like 0.2
     
  5. ghostofjk

    ghostofjk New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2006
    979
    4
    0
    Yes, warp stealth worked ON THE SAME CONCEPT with Gen 1s (I had two). Graham Davies discussed it. I think he's reachable by e-mail (from his website). I couldn't say that Gen 1s would mirror the graph you've done---I don't imagine so.

    Two small things from a proofreader's point of view:

    In the 2nd #, "delightfully" should be "delightedly". If you don't see why, PM me or ask me to explain ongroup.

    The reference to "stage 4" in the third-from-last # will leave readers not familiar with all the stages nonplussed.

    Basically, a good description of a little-understood Prius phenomenon. For non-techies, possibly either the very name "warp stealth" should be changed (it is, after all, inaccurate), or a brief explanation of why we call it that should serve as in introduction.

    Useful!
     
  6. windstrings

    windstrings Certified Prius Breeder

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2005
    6,280
    378
    0
    Location:
    Central Texas
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    IV
    Nice article!..was enjoyable to read too.
     
  7. efusco

    efusco Moderator Emeritus
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2003
    19,891
    1,192
    9
    Location:
    Nixa, MO
    Vehicle:
    2004 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    1)Nice work Hobbit, great detailed explaination. I'm sure Danny would love for you to contribute that article as well as the B-mode article to the PriusChat "articles" section here.

    2)Would change the line "
     
  8. qbee42

    qbee42 My other car is a boat

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2006
    18,058
    3,074
    7
    Location:
    Northern Michigan
    Vehicle:
    2006 Prius
    The site won't come up this morning. I'll check it later in the day.

    Tom
     
  9. eagle33199

    eagle33199 Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2006
    5,122
    268
    0
    Location:
    Minnesota
    Vehicle:
    2015 Prius v wagon
    Model:
    Two
    and here i was wondering how i got two 75MPG+ bars in a row yesterday in a 55 MPH construction zone... guess i'm better off than i thought :-p
     
  10. hobbit

    hobbit Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2005
    4,089
    468
    0
    Location:
    Bahstahn
    Vehicle:
    2004 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    Okay, some responses...
    .
    You're right about "delightedly". Fixed.
    .
    I'm assuming *some* prius experience on the part of the reader,
    in that they know what stage 4 is. But I added a reference. I hope
    that reference pointing into the "old KB articles" section will
    remain valid "effectively forever"...
    .
    I think the 1 or 2 kw goes to both spinning the engine and lightly
    pushing the car, but not hard enough to really maintain speed on
    the flat. The same as you'd get, for example, by drawing 5 or so
    amps in slower stealth mode. That's about the level I try to use
    for my "slightly augmented glide" in P&G, so I'm pretty used to
    finding that level quickly at almost any speed.
    .
    I only mention deadband because if someone's looking for no-arrows
    zero current in this state, they shouldn't bother because that's
    not where the plateau is. Hmm. "Deadband" doesn't really exist
    as a "state" anyways, since it's entirely dependent on SOC... someone
    should maybe write *that* up, too, because people keep asking.
    .
    I changed the text to not refer to charge or discharge as "negative"
    or "positive" at all, leaving it up to how peoples' instrumentation
    chooses to represent it. There's no standard. I and my li'l meter
    think of "battery current" as positive when the battery is supplying
    power, and negative when power is being pushed into it... can-view
    takes a different view, and that's fine. The graph explains itself.
    .
    "Maintained by the motors" is exactly what it means -- it is the COMBINATION
    of MG1 and MG2 torques [and their relationship to road load] that spins the engine, as it must be.
    .
    Anyways, this should bump this thread and maybe some more people
    will see it and give the updated version a read...
    .
    _H*
     
  11. Dr Rocket

    Dr Rocket New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2006
    55
    1
    0
    The article states that fuel is burned when driving in high speed in "N," yet when I do this, the indicator shows the ICE is off and nothing is being charged. It gets really quiet coasting at 80 to 85 mph down the 1/2 mile hill.
     
  12. windstrings

    windstrings Certified Prius Breeder

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2005
    6,280
    378
    0
    Location:
    Central Texas
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    IV
    Before anybody crucifies me for my conjecture.. as I am speaking out of my own speculation and observation without too much knowledge of the real working parts of the prius.

    Let me say, this sounds like a kick I was on here while back but finally let go because I didn't have too much foundation to explain it.
    This article was a nice attempt to put in a nutshell what few seem to talk about and understand.
    It gets deep into the working of the prius and its hard to defend yourself without adequate knowledge.
    Most "like myself" know just enough to be dangerous and cause even more confusion as they try to explain themselves.

    I thought that using the power of the ice to get up to speeds of 60 or 70, then letting go of the pedal briefly and maintaining just enough to barely maintain a deteriating speed so that in about 2 minutes you would loose about 10 - 15 mph on a flat surface... then speed up again and repeat.

    This almost sounds like a modified pulse and glide technique.

    I caught alot of arguement becaue many said it was foolish to use the ice to charge during the acceleration phase to then try and use that stored electrical energy to help maintain speed because electrical energy created with the ICE is never as efficient as just maintaining a constant speed?

    The arguement also indicated that varying speeds was more of a waste of efficiency than maintaining a constant speed.

    Its funny how we can use the arguement that anytime we use energy created from the ice, its not as efficient as simply using the ice alone and avoiding using the battery unless its from wasted kinetic energy.

    I know this is going to be hard to follow as I am not explaining myself well... but suffice it to say that Toyota apparently believes using the ICE to make electric energy for later use is sometimes benificial.

    Its one thing to use the ICE when the battery is "dangerosly" low, but its quite another when the ICE charges the battery when its already in an ok state.

    After saying all that.... my arguement was that once the ICE is on, it likes to do some work.. might as well make electric energy while it propels the car down the road right?

    Hence the benifit of the any pulse and glide technique.

    I've heard Truckers talk about how thier diesels seem to run better pulling a load.
    The atkinson engine seems to have some similiar properties in that it has a very high compression ratio and likes to work hard once it really gets going.

    Why not make electric power when the ICE is operating at optimum efficiency so the electric can take the load when the ICE would be a waste to use like in low load situations when its not that efficient.

    At any rate, the warp stealth seems to be a modified way of saying the electric helps out when the ICE is just kicking back even at high speeds with the throttle feathered, and then the ICE kicks in to regain speed while recharging the batteries.

    Too bad the electric is not just a little more powerful as it seems you could maintain a speed for quite a distance even at high speeds if it were so.

    Too bad we don't have the battery the Camry has in it? :(
    I think the next generation prius with a bigger battery and higher rpm mg1 could be exciting.
     
  13. ken1784

    ken1784 SuperMID designer

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2003
    2,940
    1,365
    67
    Location:
    Yokohama, JAPAN
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
  14. hobbit

    hobbit Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2005
    4,089
    468
    0
    Location:
    Bahstahn
    Vehicle:
    2004 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    Wind -- in the description, I don't think I really particularly
    advocate a P&G technique on the highways per se, I just describe
    a better "glide" side for when it's appropriate. You're pretty much
    right about heavy use of the battery -- yes, there are conversion
    losses. The reason P&G works is that it avoids having the engine
    "loaf" at low RPM and low power output -- have another look at
    http://techno-fandom.org/~hobbit/cars/prius-curves.gif and note
    how ICE efficiency falls off until it's torquing good and hard
    against a load at 15 kW or so. That's what you try to do on a
    typical pulse -- run it up on top of that curve, and then let it
    shut down completely, instead of sinking down into that low-efficiency
    region by continuing to run. Because of the hysteresis in the
    system, you have to vary what your foot does a little wider to help
    it make the decision.
    .
    But that's really talking about low-speed P&G again. At high speeds
    the jury's still out on whether actually trying to *pulse* and then
    warp-stealth glide buys anything -- in my own experience it doesn't,
    in fact, and as Ken points out it's often better to just set the CC
    on the interstates and sit back. But we've all noticed that the CC
    is pretty aggressive uphill to maintain an exact speed, especially
    if it's fallen behind a little -- which starts getting over toward
    the *other* side of that curve [which nonetheless is fairly flat
    anyways, so it doesn't hurt too much] but the higher and harder you
    run the engine the more heat you're throwing off as well, so going
    uphill under slightly less power and letting speed bleed off a bit
    to regain again on the backside probably does save a bit of energy.
    The debates and wildly differing sets of calculations concerning
    this have raged for *years*, and can be found sprinkled through the
    archives of prius_technical_stuff and other forums.
    .
    Still, even those not-quite-as-aggessive accelerations [okay, we
    can call them "pulses"] can bring you up around 60 mph, and if you're
    on a road with a 50 mph speed limit you might want to back 'er down
    a little. That's where warp-stealth is really useful, because it
    provides a don't-loaf-the-engine way of doing that. It also helps
    to read your upcoming terrain and figure out when it's more appropriate
    or not. Like if you're pulling and about to hit an uphill, don't
    go to warp-stealth just because you're 5 over, just hold tight and
    use the momentum to aid the ascent. Warp-stealth isn't presented as
    a magic-bullet solution, it's simply a component, a tool in the whole
    set that you use for high-mileage driving in general.
    .
    Have I stuck even close to the topic you were chasing down here??...
    .
    For Ken -- there are so many other factors in play that it's really
    hard to present clean, isolated MPG numbers. I have observed in
    general that if I use my variety of techniques I can do a bit better
    than the CC, but not *extremely* better ... and that distinction
    becomes even narrower at higher speeds.
    .
    _H*
     
  15. windstrings

    windstrings Certified Prius Breeder

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2005
    6,280
    378
    0
    Location:
    Central Texas
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    IV
    Well I do recognize that both of you guys know far more than I do about the system and I'm just throwing in conjecture on the sidelines.
    The part about the glide technique I see as benificial is that if you can achieve that state, its the most friction free state the prius can achieve and then when you fire up the ICE, you put it in the most effecient state it can acheive as you go ahead an regain the speed lost from gliding..... and the battery gets charged again to help the glide again.

    True glide without ICE or battery is the most desirable, but good luck on holding that for any length of time.. so in the real world, its about the battery slightly assistiing the glide... but something has to charge the battery back up right?.. its not the glide doing it... or else your gliding wrong as friction kills your kinetic benifit.
    Its never good to kill needed kinetic speed to charge batteries?... charging batteries is best done with "wasted" kinetic energy or with the ICE under a "like you said" greater than 15kw load.

    So we are slicing and dicing the two most efficient states of the prius in this process.

    Some choose to go to neutral to glide, but that seems aweful busy to me.. I would rather learn to feather the throttle. I can see how going to neutral would be far easier, but not near as relaxing and enjoyable a trip.
    I don't want to have to work to save gas... I want the car to do the work so I can enjoy my trip.
     
  16. judibob

    judibob New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2006
    20
    0
    0
    Location:
    Copper Country
    I can certainly attest to the existence of this 'warp stealth' regime. I've noticed this as I've been playing the Prius game when possible/practical, and have noticed the immediate switch from 'battery current only' to the ICE kicking in. The mileage figures I've been getting support this, as I'm ready to post into the 'I beat the EPA' stickie. I've been consistently above 55mpg highway, with my figures at ~58-59 mpg.
    My driving is mostly (about 90%) highway (as opposed to expressway) driving. I consider myself very lucky when seeing the other posters showing pics of their MFD with 60+ mpg, but also showing a 15 mile trip in an hour! You can have the stop&go, and great that the Prius works as it does in that congested rural setting. That is really helping the cause. No, my normal commute is 12 miles, no stoplights, all highway, no traffic, can drive whatever speed I want. I turn onto the highway from my driveway, and turn off into my parking lot at work. OK, there is a 45mph zone, then 35mph zone as I get into town to my workplace, but that only helps!
    Anyway, when driving in the 50-60 mph region I've been able to use this technique, as I've been trying to attain the classic pulse & glide at those speeds. Depending on SOC, I've been able to get there at 50+ mph speeds, but for short periods of time.
    It's a game, for sure, but can be fun & rewarding to get that fuel economy.
    Thanks for this post and the good information.
     
  17. ken1784

    ken1784 SuperMID designer

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2003
    2,940
    1,365
    67
    Location:
    Yokohama, JAPAN
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(judibob @ Jun 1 2006, 09:45 PM) [snapback]263968[/snapback]</div>
    Would you please try to measure mileage using the CC method below?
    http://priuschat.com/index.php?showtopic=19638&st=8

    Thank you,
    Ken@Japan
     
  18. barbaram

    barbaram Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2006
    911
    70
    9
    Location:
    Trenton, NJ
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    IV
    There is no one more annoying when driving someplace like the NJ turnpike who does not keep a constant speed with cruise. I think at 65+ the cruise cotrol does a pretty good job. Otherwise in more trafficy situations try the pulse- it does seem to work better.
    Lucky those of you who can play with the road to yourself!!!!! :lol:
     
  19. hobbit

    hobbit Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2005
    4,089
    468
    0
    Location:
    Bahstahn
    Vehicle:
    2004 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    The article points out -- and Ken, this may help answer your issue
    too -- that on downhills the cruise *can* fairly often hop onto the
    "warp stealth" plateau. And it's often been stated that in general,
    letting speed bleed off a bit uphill and regaining it on the backside
    tends to yield better mileage overall than trying to rigidly maintain
    an exact constant speed regardless of terrain. When you add judicious
    use of warp stealth *to* that methodology, you should do pretty well.
    .
    But at fast highway speeds, the gains aren't going to be all that
    stunning anyways -- nasty ol' air-resistance.
    .
    _H*
     
  20. judibob

    judibob New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2006
    20
    0
    0
    Location:
    Copper Country
    I checked the link you included in your comment. I thought this driving style was more or less common sense.
    In any case, this is usually the way I drive. I drive this way in non-hybrids as well, especially those with automatic transmissions. As you'll notice, many times an AT-equipped car will downshift & actually accelerate when faced with a stiff uphill while in CC. So, over the years, I've gotten into the habit of going off CC in this condition. Now, in the Prius, I also go out of CC going downhill to take advantage of getting the powertrain to do what I prefer.

    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(ken1784 @ Jun 1 2006, 09:34 PM) [snapback]264391[/snapback]</div>