Can't we all.. get alone?

Discussion in 'Environmental Discussion' started by cyclopathic, Jul 16, 2011.

  1. cyclopathic

    cyclopathic Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2011
    2,072
    274
    2014 Prius C
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    II
    honestly.. why the AGW/anti-AGW discussions have to be so ideologically charged?

    except for maybe some rare nutcases, aren't we all interested in learning the actual facts and sharing scientific data, not projecting faith based believes?
     
  2. richard schumacher

    richard schumacher shortbus driver

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2004
    7,652
    881
    United States
    Vehicle:
    2004 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    Apparently most people are not, once they learn that doing anything about it might increase their energy bill by 20%.

    In 200 years, when anyone thinks of the United States, they will think of it as one of those countries that bankrupted themselves and then dried up and blew away.
     
  3. spiderman

    spiderman wretched

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2009
    7,457
    1,431
    Alaska
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    II
    Pass around the pipe... peace pipe that is.
     
  4. tochatihu

    tochatihu Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2004
    4,216
    688
    Kunming Yunnan China
    Vehicle:
    2001 Prius
    RS, have you seen the negative costs described here?

    Sustainability & Resource Productivity | Latest thinking | Greenhouse gas abatement cost curves | McKinsey & Company

    I would be the first to agree that their methodology is, um, non-transparent. But increased efficiency in many cases does appear to be win-winnish according to many sources.

    Lets have solar-grown in Spidey's peacepipe! That 'indoor' stuff looks pretty carbon-expensive (previous PC threads); perhaps at par with (legal) convenience foods.
     
    2 people like this.
  5. Mendel Leisk

    Mendel Leisk Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2010
    7,321
    1,421
    Greater Vancouver, BC, Canada
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    I just happen to have Marvin Gaye's song on that subject stuck in my head, for about the last 12 hours. Not bad. Now maybe someone else will ;)

    Ok, close: it's "everybody want to live together".
     
  6. wjtracy

    wjtracy Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2006
    5,207
    854
    Northern VA (NoVA)
    Vehicle:
    2006 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    Because at the end of day, all the objective scientific facts must be rolled into a subjective action plan with profound impact, e.g, if we were to do Al Gore's action plan, picking winners and losers.
     
  7. spiderman

    spiderman wretched

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2009
    7,457
    1,431
    Alaska
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    II
    If even that were the case...
     
  8. hyo silver

    hyo silver Awaaaaay

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2005
    15,164
    1,408
    off into the sunset
    Vehicle:
    2004 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    Nice thought, cyclopathic.

    Another nice thought.

    But then...we can't even agree that reality exists, let alone what it looks like and where we fit into the picture.
     
  9. phoebeisis

    phoebeisis Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2006
    118
    10
    Because the "correct answer" isn't obvious.If it was obvious that we would lose Miami,NOLA, NYNY and many other coastal cities-we would act.
    We also ape the behavior of our pols and TV commentators.The right is vicious and the left is an arrogant bunch of know it alls preaching down to the little guys while pretending to be "for us.".
    And many left wingers have been sooooo pompous for soooo long that when they adopted GW it became poisonous for right wingers.
    Gore is a pompous whatever whose family fortune was built on " agriculture" in the pre war south, so why believe him? It is easy to suggest he might be in it for the $$$ (probably not true, but certainly plausible)
    It just isn't obvious enough-and we hate/mistrust the other side.
    Once the left adopted it- it became poison.
    We just act like the folks we see on TV.
    Charlie
     
    2 people like this.
  10. mmcdonal

    mmcdonal Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2010
    670
    96
    Columbia MD
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    IV
    I see your point, OP. Thanks phoebeisis, for demonstrating the OP's point with that hilarious parody.
     
  11. Corwyn

    Corwyn Energy Curmudgeon

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2011
    2,138
    629
    Maine
    Vehicle:
    2007 Prius
    Model:
    II
  12. tochatihu

    tochatihu Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2004
    4,216
    688
    Kunming Yunnan China
    Vehicle:
    2001 Prius
    Actually it seems to me that we get along pretty well in this chat. If you look at the public comments left at news media sites following political (or even politcally charged issues such as human effects on climate) stories, you will really see the fur fly.

    We won't solve these issues here, not even probably change too many points of view. But it can't hurt too much to talk about what we find to be probably correct. And importantly, what sources of information led us to those conclusions.
     
    1 person likes this.
  13. cyclopathic

    cyclopathic Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2011
    2,072
    274
    2014 Prius C
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    II
    IMHO it is more then that..

    Saw the interview with Michael Sherman, author of http://www.amazon.com/Believing-Brain-Conspiracies-How-Construct-Reinforce/dp/0805091254

    In short words our minds are not scientists, they are lawyers. Instead collecting and objectively analyzing facts we are set out to look for prove to support our believes.
     
  14. tochatihu

    tochatihu Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2004
    4,216
    688
    Kunming Yunnan China
    Vehicle:
    2001 Prius
    I've known many graduate students, US, Chinese and 'other'. First as among them, then from the perspective of post doc or prof. I see support for the central theme of Sherman (just above), which has of course been extolled by many other authors.

    It really seems to matter what people learn first. Consistent with later knowledge or not, that first stuff is really sticky. The second issue is once somebody has gone to the trouble of creating an hypothesis, they often tend to look for support rather than for confirmation/refutation (as equally satisfactory outcomes). This is more than just adopting an hypothesis from someone admired. It is your own baby, and it cannot possibly be ugly.

    One way to try to cure this is by example. We are very often doing experiments that have not ever been done before. I am always quick to predict outcomes, and to say why I think so. And if things turn out differently, I say, look at that - I was wrong - now we need to find out out what's really going on here.

    Not wrong all that often though :)

    But the point I'm trying to make is that science is not a confident walk directly towards an anticipated goal. Neither is it a drunkard's random walk with eyes closed, maybe bumping into the right answer. It is in between, with lots of small steps this way or that. Once in a while, there is a much larger leap which resolves several earlier unresolved questions into a nice self-consistent package. This could be one definition of theories.

    A big part of science training is finding the right balance. Between defending your own ideas, and being on the lookout for different ideas that make your baby look downright ugly. If you think it would be easy to train that, you ought to give it a try.

    Lawyers, I should think, would not be learning that at all. It would only distract from the primary goal, which is to win. In science the goal is to be right, somehow or other, sooner or later.
     
    1 person likes this.
  15. spiderman

    spiderman wretched

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2009
    7,457
    1,431
    Alaska
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    II
    Well said DAS.

    "
    "
    The word ingrained comes to mind.
     
  16. bisco

    bisco cookie crumbler

    Joined:
    May 11, 2005
    27,405
    4,713
    boston
    Vehicle:
    2012 Prius Plug-in
    Model:
    Plug-in Base
    is the goal to be right, or is the goal to discover the correct answer?
     
    1 person likes this.
  17. spiderman

    spiderman wretched

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2009
    7,457
    1,431
    Alaska
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    II
    ^ good point bisco.
     
  18. no trust

    no trust Junior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2011
    39
    7
    Powhatan, VA
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    Model:
    II
    Drive a prius to save money not the world! God has the plan when science thinks its figured it out it will be in to late!
     
  19. fuzzy1

    fuzzy1 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2009
    7,681
    2,012
    Western Washington
    Vehicle:
    2012 Prius
    Model:
    Three
    But we would lose NOLA anyway, even in the absence of AGW. Its local environmental insults are moving faster than the global issues.
     
  20. cyclopathic

    cyclopathic Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2011
    2,072
    274
    2014 Prius C
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    II
    At the end this is what sets scientists and believers aside

    or to put in words of Socrates: Amicus Plato, sed magis amica veritas