I have no pleasure in reporting this news but I was able to see it at the first Munro Associates, open house. This is the death rattle somewhere: Detroit MBAs - at the first open house, there were three distinct groups; new business engineers and managers - they were taking furious notes because they’d never heard these lessons before old school Detroit - there to recall past acquaintances with Sandy but more like patting the red headed stepson on the head. Amen chorus - me China standing room only - the exact lectures Detroit treated as amusing were attended in Asia SOLD OUT and in China, shared with everyone who stood outside. They were taking notes furiously I know it is popular to claim China stole our patents and intellectual property. But the most important was how to unleash engineering skills and manufacturing discipline that Sandy taught and Musk occasionally exhibits. China is ascending because they learned how to unleash their technologists while Detroit got MBAs and sabotaging purchasing departments. Instead of competing, Detroit “outsourced” themselves into oblivion. Ford seems less bad with an adroit redirection of their EV battery section. But as for the rest, “burning down the house.” I don’t have an answer but feel more the frustration of Casandra who knew the future only to be patronized into oblivion. Bob Wilson
Getting an MBA degree sadly does more to encourage white collar criminals than it does to actually benefit society in the way people with an engineering degree can do... And the US has been declining a long time in that regard: A 2005 New York Times story reported that more than 600,000 engineers graduated from Chinese institutions compared to 70,000 in the United States — that's the number that got widely circulated a decade-plus ago. https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5478159 China now graduates roughly 1.3 million engineers per year versus about 130,000 in the United States — a roughly 10-to-1 gap. Some analysts put it even higher, at 1.38 million Chinese engineering graduates annually, about seven times the U.S. figure. China graduates 1.3 million engineers per year, versus just 130,000 in the U.S. We need AI to bridge the gap | Fortune
At age 76, I am effectively unemployable. But I got to spend more time with my late, homebound wife. Now I just natter around in the time remaining. . . doing what interests me. Bob Wilson
At the rate I'm going, I certainly hope I'm still employable at 76 because I'm going to have to still be working by then. One thing that affects the job market is the same principal of supply and demand that affects everything else. If the number of engineers suddenly doubled then the average salary of an engineer would go down. And keep in mind that this is a global market, so while governments can try to implement protectionism to keep their workers with the same salaries, in the end the cost-effectiveness of having a glut of skilled workers elsewhere eventually filters in and makes such skills less lucrative in all countries. The exception is unless it's the type of skilled job that has to be done locally, then it's dependent only on the local job market. Basically, if you want a lucrative career, you need to find something that is desperately needed that no one else can do or wants to do.
^ Yep; talked my nieces and nephews into healthcare careers. They're all doing great and have a job waiting for them. Great portability too and chances of getting outsourced is slim to null. There are many facids to a healthcare vocation - NOT just nurses and doctors; also support staff, PT, facilities to support the infrastructure. I've seen the outsourcing thing; up close and personnel - but most staff are too stupid to realize that they're basically giving away their own jobs. I've had department managers and facility directors invite me to lunch at very fancy restaurants; after I've retired. They would ask me how to resolve issues of inflated cost and lower equipment up-time trends in their spreadsheets that didn't exists, before I retired. Told them to sign maintenance contracts with minimum up-time guarantees and penalties for the critical equipment - That's what I would do to ensure operational readiness. Tell that department(s) that they have 3 years to clean house or effectively be replaced with contractors that can actually do the job on-budget and on-time. The cost of those maintenance contracts would be the yard-stick that they should easily beat - otherwise, they're just a parasite on the facilities operating budget. The spreadsheet already shows the pattern of mismanagement. YMMV