9/11 Images

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(dbermanmd @ Sep 12 2007, 11:06 AM) [snapback]511333[/snapback]</div>

=berman getting pwned!

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(dbermanmd @ Sep 12 2007, 11:06 AM) [snapback]511333[/snapback]</div>

=berman getting pwned!

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(dbermanmd @ Sep 12 2007, 11:24 AM) [snapback]511357[/snapback]</div>

I'll play I'll play... The answer to your question is yes. So you win this round, happy?

Now your turn...

Hypothetically, let's say after 30 years of unsuccessful american conventional military intervention resulted in no appreciable elimination of "al-qaeda", the ONLY way to eliminate the threat were to nuke 3 hypothetical muslim cities that harbored these evildoers, would you approve of this tactic? Yes or no. Giving any of your typical spin-fluff results in an immediate taser up your bum.

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(dbermanmd @ Sep 12 2007, 11:24 AM) [snapback]511357[/snapback]</div>

I'll play I'll play... The answer to your question is yes. So you win this round, happy?

Now your turn...

Hypothetically, let's say after 30 years of unsuccessful american conventional military intervention resulted in no appreciable elimination of "al-qaeda", the ONLY way to eliminate the threat were to nuke 3 hypothetical muslim cities that harbored these evildoers, would you approve of this tactic? Yes or no. Giving any of your typical spin-fluff results in an immediate taser up your bum.

 

"at least the good doctor knows that his line of debate is headed in a direction most liberals do not want to go -"
You don't think I know you're schtick is or where it's headed? You can't even comprehend that a non-liberal could disagree with you. You paint me and nearly any other poster that disagrees with you as a liberal poster.

Your bias is so complete it blinds you. Though it is entertaining.
You do make good points from time to time that I agree with, and I apreciate and respect your views. But you always revert back to baiting, black and white framing, and generalizations. Something I love to point out and mock, regardless of the political leanings of the poster.

"Take Care"!
<sarcasm>
Oh, and have you stopped beating your wife yet? Yes or no only please. </sarcasm>

 

"at least the good doctor knows that his line of debate is headed in a direction most liberals do not want to go -"
You don't think I know you're schtick is or where it's headed? You can't even comprehend that a non-liberal could disagree with you. You paint me and nearly any other poster that disagrees with you as a liberal poster.

Your bias is so complete it blinds you. Though it is entertaining.
You do make good points from time to time that I agree with, and I apreciate and respect your views. But you always revert back to baiting, black and white framing, and generalizations. Something I love to point out and mock, regardless of the political leanings of the poster.

"Take Care"!
<sarcasm>
Oh, and have you stopped beating your wife yet? Yes or no only please. </sarcasm>

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(dbermanmd @ Sep 12 2007, 09:01 AM) [snapback]511185[/snapback]</div>

posttraumatic stress episodes are nice too. why you would want to subject so many people to that by not only providing an indirect reminder which is usually sufficient, but to play the tapes over and over again... is beyond me.

psychological trauma for many is worse than physical trauma. i'd sooner break both my legs.

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(dbermanmd @ Sep 12 2007, 09:01 AM) [snapback]511185[/snapback]</div>

posttraumatic stress episodes are nice too. why you would want to subject so many people to that by not only providing an indirect reminder which is usually sufficient, but to play the tapes over and over again... is beyond me.

psychological trauma for many is worse than physical trauma. i'd sooner break both my legs.

 

Hey what happened to the original post of why 9/11 images are not shown?

Who changed the subj... wait a minute it was the Dr? Tsk tsk tsk

so back to the original question.

I don't need to be reminded that over 3000 people have died then and over 3000 since. I see it and hear it in some shape or form every day, don't you? How sad for you to suggest to reduce such an event to a media and ratings event that just MUST BE SEEN.

If you are trying to make the point of shaking awake the masses, you got another thing coming. America has moved on to more pressing things, such as the Brittney debacle at the MTV event only to be out done 2 days later by ... lets see oh yeah "Led Zeppelin to Perform Comeback Gig"

 

Hey what happened to the original post of why 9/11 images are not shown?

Who changed the subj... wait a minute it was the Dr? Tsk tsk tsk

so back to the original question.

I don't need to be reminded that over 3000 people have died then and over 3000 since. I see it and hear it in some shape or form every day, don't you? How sad for you to suggest to reduce such an event to a media and ratings event that just MUST BE SEEN.

If you are trying to make the point of shaking awake the masses, you got another thing coming. America has moved on to more pressing things, such as the Brittney debacle at the MTV event only to be out done 2 days later by ... lets see oh yeah "Led Zeppelin to Perform Comeback Gig"

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(dbermanmd @ Sep 12 2007, 11:24 AM) [snapback]511357[/snapback]</div>

Do we know where those targets are? do we have at least a decent probability that any attack we organize will be successful in that arena?

We went into Iraq because of al queda and WMD's, and when we got there we found neither. Oh sure, later al queda started operating there, but that was only made possible by the power vacuum left by our attack and occupation. So tell me, was the cost (billions of dollars, thousands of lives, and an immeasurable amount of political good will) worth the end result (a civil war, and a likelihood that the country will split and make neighboring countries, like Iran, stronger)?

I'd say sure, it's a priority. But only one, out of many. There are other priorities to be considered: Maintaining international goodwill. Maintaining/improving the economy. decreasing our countries reliance on foreign energy sources. the health of our citizens. This war in Iraq has had a serious negative effect on the other priorities of our country.

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(dbermanmd @ Sep 12 2007, 11:24 AM) [snapback]511357[/snapback]</div>

Do we know where those targets are? do we have at least a decent probability that any attack we organize will be successful in that arena?

We went into Iraq because of al queda and WMD's, and when we got there we found neither. Oh sure, later al queda started operating there, but that was only made possible by the power vacuum left by our attack and occupation. So tell me, was the cost (billions of dollars, thousands of lives, and an immeasurable amount of political good will) worth the end result (a civil war, and a likelihood that the country will split and make neighboring countries, like Iran, stronger)?

I'd say sure, it's a priority. But only one, out of many. There are other priorities to be considered: Maintaining international goodwill. Maintaining/improving the economy. decreasing our countries reliance on foreign energy sources. the health of our citizens. This war in Iraq has had a serious negative effect on the other priorities of our country.

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(dbermanmd @ Sep 12 2007, 07:44 AM) [snapback]511304[/snapback]</div>

This is RICH considering the source and his reputation for dishonesty and ignoring pertinent questions specifically directed at him over and over. If you saw yourself as you have led others to see you, you would never make such a statement about being 'honest' or a demand to just 'answer the questions'. Your opinions are yours, but you don't get to make demands on others when you can't meet those demands yourself. This shows further moral weakness.

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(dbermanmd @ Sep 12 2007, 07:44 AM) [snapback]511304[/snapback]</div>

This is RICH considering the source and his reputation for dishonesty and ignoring pertinent questions specifically directed at him over and over. If you saw yourself as you have led others to see you, you would never make such a statement about being 'honest' or a demand to just 'answer the questions'. Your opinions are yours, but you don't get to make demands on others when you can't meet those demands yourself. This shows further moral weakness.