1. Attachments are working again! Check out this thread for more details and to report any other bugs.

Al Gore wins Nobel Peace Prize

Discussion in 'Fred's House of Pancakes' started by JackDodge, Oct 12, 2007.

  1. dbermanmd

    dbermanmd New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2005
    8,553
    18
    0
    Location:
    manhattan
    Vehicle:
    2006 Prius
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(efusco @ Oct 12 2007, 10:51 AM) [snapback]524603[/snapback]</div>
    We agree. Everyone should act in a responsible manner when it comes to the environment. It is an important message - my wish is that Al Gore would at least act in a similar vein as he wants others to.

    I am responsible for myself - hence my Prius and my two wood burning stoves in my home - I have decreased my natural gas use by over 75% since i put them in not to mention saved thousands of $'s already. I would love to go solar but it is still not there yet for us.... soon i hope.

    My other problem is that I dont think that the Nobel Prize for Peace fits here.
     
  2. malorn

    malorn Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2005
    4,281
    59
    0
    Location:
    &quot;Somewhere in Flyover Country&quot;
    Vehicle:
    Other Non-Hybrid
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(dbermanmd @ Oct 12 2007, 09:59 AM) [snapback]524610[/snapback]</div>
    I think it is very dangerous to show any movie in schools which contain political overtones of any shape or form. There has been talk of it showing up in schools in this area but so far it has not.
     
  3. Spoid

    Spoid New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2006
    286
    0
    0
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(eagle33199 @ Oct 12 2007, 06:59 AM) [snapback]524577[/snapback]</div>
    I nominate Steve Wozniak. Or Bill Gates. They changed the world. Heck, even Hitler changed the world, but I don't think he deserves a prize for that.
     
  4. Ichabod

    Ichabod Artist In Residence

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2006
    1,794
    19
    0
    Location:
    Newton, MA
    Vehicle:
    2006 Prius
    I also tend to disagree with showing that or most any movie in school. Mostly because I think that's lazy of the educators, and almost always questionable in terms of content. In school kids should be active and engaged in learning. That's a different issue entirely though ;)
     
  5. efusco

    efusco Moderator Emeritus
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2003
    19,891
    1,193
    9
    Location:
    Nixa, MO
    Vehicle:
    2004 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(malorn @ Oct 12 2007, 10:01 AM) [snapback]524611[/snapback]</div>
    Don't pick extreme off the wall examples...look at the meat of the message. That's the last bastage of those who choose not to believe in GW...first they slam the messenger, then they give some extreme example from a fringe enviro extremist. Then they do nothing proclaiming all environmentalists as liberal idiots.

    There are so many thing we can all do that cost little or nothing and in aggregate can have a large impact...don't idle your car when you run inside in hot or cold weather, switch to CFLs, turn off lights, use a programmable thermostat, etc. Yet so many people won't even do these little things b/c they're too busy making excuses.

    This isn't like a huge military build up, this will clearly have both short term and long term benefits at little or no cost. And, again, the science is all solid...not to the cause, but to the fact that we're headed to a historical high temps for the planet...we may or may not be part of the cause...but it doesn't matter, we can and should do what we can to make the world better...and maybe one day we'll find out that we did save the planet...maybe not...I don't care. It's still the right thing to do.
     
  6. dbermanmd

    dbermanmd New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2005
    8,553
    18
    0
    Location:
    manhattan
    Vehicle:
    2006 Prius
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(malorn @ Oct 12 2007, 11:07 AM) [snapback]524616[/snapback]</div>
    Agreed. My youngest kid is in Middle School and his music teacher went nuts over President Bush and the Iraq War during class. He was promptly put down - next time - gonso. The schools have a clear set of guidelines for teachers - NO PERSONAL POLITICS in class.
     
  7. efusco

    efusco Moderator Emeritus
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2003
    19,891
    1,193
    9
    Location:
    Nixa, MO
    Vehicle:
    2004 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(malorn @ Oct 12 2007, 10:07 AM) [snapback]524616[/snapback]</div>
    Yea, 'cause kids can't think, can't ask questions, can't process information on their own and the world is such a black and white place otherwise.

    No, I don't want my kids intentionally brainwashed in some systematic fashion, but showing them things, teaching them things and having them think and wonder about it is as much a part of education as are the 3Rs.
    Everything in this world has political overtones...should we not tell them about Iraq? How about the revolutionary war...I seem to recall there were political overtones to that. The Civil war too.

    IOW, no systematic brain washing, yes to open discussion of real issues that exist in the world...political, religious, or otherwise. If we try to sterilize our schools we'll sterilize our kids' thought process. I choose to send my kids to public school BECAUSE of the diverse opinions, ideas, races and religions they're exposed to.
     
  8. malorn

    malorn Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2005
    4,281
    59
    0
    Location:
    &quot;Somewhere in Flyover Country&quot;
    Vehicle:
    Other Non-Hybrid
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(efusco @ Oct 12 2007, 10:25 AM) [snapback]524634[/snapback]</div>
    Would you object to your children being shown "the great global warming swindle" in class? I would object to that movie being shown as well. I think any movie where there is any sort of call to action at the end should be off-limits in school. Now if the two movies were shown to a given class which resulted in a lengthy discussion I might be ok with that. Might.
     
  9. TimBikes

    TimBikes New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2005
    2,492
    245
    0
    Location:
    WA
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Ichabod @ Oct 12 2007, 08:12 AM) [snapback]524621[/snapback]</div>
    A different issue, perhaps. But I find it ironic that the day before winning the Nobel Prize, Gore lost badly in court regarding the scientific accuracy of his prime accomplishment, "An Inconvenient Truth". In my opinion, there is a political undercurrent here to elevate the man, promote his message, and promote his movie, despite some quite significant inaccuracies:

    Error one

    Al Gore: A sea-level rise of up to 20 feet would be caused by melting of either West Antarctica or Greenland “in the near futureâ€.

    The judge’s finding: “This is distinctly alarmist and part of Mr Gore’s â€wake-up call“. It was common ground that if Greenland melted it would release this amount of water - “but only after, and over, millennia.â€

    Error two

    Gore: Low-lying inhabited Pacific atolls are already “being inundated because of anthropogenic global warming.â€

    Judge: There was no evidence of any evacuation having yet happened.

    Error three

    Gore: The documentary described global warming potentially “shutting down the Ocean Conveyor†- the process by which the Gulf Stream is carried over the North Atlantic to western Europe.

    Judge: According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), it was “very unlikely†it would be shut down, though it might slow down.

    Error four

    Gore: He asserted - by ridiculing the opposite view - that two graphs, one plotting a rise in C02 and the other the rise in temperature over a period of 650,000 years, showed “an exact fitâ€.

    Judge: Although there was general scientific agreement that there was a connection, “the two graphs do not establish what Mr Gore assertsâ€.

    Error five

    Gore: The disappearance of snow on Mt Kilimanjaro was expressly attributable to global warming.

    Judge: This “specifically impressed†David Miliband, the Environment Secretary, but the scientific consensus was that it cannot be established that the recession of snows on Mt Kilimanjaro is mainly attributable to human-induced climate change.

    Error six

    Gore: The drying up of Lake Chad was used in the film as a prime example of a catastrophic result of global warming, said the judge.

    Judge: “It is generally accepted that the evidence remains insufficient to establish such an attribution. It is apparently considered to be far more likely to result from other factors, such as population increase and over-grazing, and regional climate variability.â€

    Error seven

    Gore: Hurricane Katrina and the consequent devastation in New Orleans to global warming.

    Judge: There is “insufficient evidence to show thatâ€.

    Error eight

    Gore: Referred to a new scientific study showing that, for the first time, polar bears were being found that had actually drowned “swimming long distances - up to 60 miles - to find the iceâ€.

    Judge: “The only scientific study that either side before me can find is one which indicates that four polar bears have recently been found drowned because of a storm." That was not to say there might not in future be drowning-related deaths of bears if the trend of regression of pack ice continued - “but it plainly does not support Mr Gore’s descriptionâ€.

    Error nine

    Gore: Coral reefs all over the world were bleaching because of global warming and other factors.

    Judge: The IPCC had reported that, if temperatures were to rise by 1-3 degrees centigrade, there would be increased coral bleaching and mortality, unless the coral could adapt. But separating the impacts of stresses due to climate change from other stresses, such as over-fishing, and pollution was difficult.
     
  10. malorn

    malorn Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2005
    4,281
    59
    0
    Location:
    &quot;Somewhere in Flyover Country&quot;
    Vehicle:
    Other Non-Hybrid
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(TimBikes @ Oct 12 2007, 10:31 AM) [snapback]524639[/snapback]</div>
    Case in point if you polled 100 people who had seen "an Inconvenient Truth" in say the first month of realease when Katrinaetc was still fresh in everyones mind and you asked one question: "Does global warming contribute to the frequency and strength of hurricanes? What would at least 75% of them say? Yes. Even though there is absolutley 0 scientific consensus on the topic, there are scientists saying it does, scientists saying it doesn't even scientists saying it would have the opposite effect.
     
  11. efusco

    efusco Moderator Emeritus
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2003
    19,891
    1,193
    9
    Location:
    Nixa, MO
    Vehicle:
    2004 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(malorn @ Oct 12 2007, 10:30 AM) [snapback]524638[/snapback]</div>
    Haven't seen it, but, again, as long as there's opportunity for discussion and not some planned effort at brainwashing in a systematic manner throughout the educational process I wouldn't object. My kids know where I stand on environmental issues.

    I'm athiest, I don't object to the kids' Christian day care teaching them about the bible. Exposure is good, they may swing one direction on a topic for a while, but they're not stupid, they can process new information into old and are able to ask any question any time and get an honest answer from me in an unbiased manner. I tell them why I think the way I do, I tell them they're able to choose what they wish.

    The only parents who have anything to fear by their kids being exposed to this kind of diversity are those parents who can't/won't or don't communicate openly with their own kids or who have some agenda of their own that they plan to brainwash their kids with and are afraid that their agenda will be disturbed.
     
  12. malorn

    malorn Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2005
    4,281
    59
    0
    Location:
    &quot;Somewhere in Flyover Country&quot;
    Vehicle:
    Other Non-Hybrid
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(efusco @ Oct 12 2007, 10:39 AM) [snapback]524644[/snapback]</div>
    I respect that.
     
  13. TimBikes

    TimBikes New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2005
    2,492
    245
    0
    Location:
    WA
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(efusco @ Oct 12 2007, 08:39 AM) [snapback]524644[/snapback]</div>
    I think it is fine if they show "Swindle" and "AIT" back to back. That would really get kids thinking about what really is the truth and that in life, there is usually not much that is completely absolute.
     
  14. hycamguy07

    hycamguy07 New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    2,707
    3
    0
    Location:
    Central Florida
    Vehicle:
    2007 Prius
    Man you people (you know who you are) never cease to amaze me... :blink:

    Put the shoe on another parties foot and you would be right there bashing away... <_<

    And even though AG has been proven to be a swindler and confused in his statments and actions, its ok though because hes a liberal democrat... ;)

    Im happy for him that he got a NPP, as Dr Berman has stated they will give those out to anyone these days, it seems... But again Congrats AG, for his err, accompishment. :rolleyes:

    With that said, I think He and all of the pseudo intellects have all of the idiots of the world in a lather because of global climate change. He is right...the climate is changing. It is always changes and is cyclical throughout time. It is changing because of cyclical changes like those of 100s and 1000s of years ago. It's just warmer now that it was 50 years ago. It is not a by-product of "our carbon footprint" and the pollutants in the air and over population. How is it that when the dinosaurs roamed the earth much of today's northern climates were tropical. Did t-rex prodcue so much methane gas through his farts to cause a dramatic climate shift. How is it that ice flowed and covered areas that are now the US south with current temperate or sub tropical climates.

    You global warming psuedo scientists need to get a clue and realize that there are forces beyond our control and that not everything is man-made and not every technology is evil.

    If Algore cared so much for the environment, why does he still drive gas guzzlers and live in 10,000 s/f homes. If he were the environmentalist you think he is, he should be living in the woods and eating berries and set an example for us evil people that drive SUVs and have the audacity to want to be comfortable and run our a/c.

    What's sad is at least 1/2 of you that read this are buying into that BS.
     
  15. nerfer

    nerfer A young senior member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2006
    2,507
    237
    28
    Location:
    Chicagoland, IL, USA, Earth
    Vehicle:
    Other Hybrid
    Model:
    N/A
    To the point at hand, I was rather surprised when I heard this. Generally they wait a decade or two (or three) so they can see the impact that was made in a historical context. Giving the peace prize to work this new is unusual, so it seems to me that they are trying to make a political/environmental point beyond just recognition for work well done.

    I'm not particularly a fan of Al Gore and I haven't seen his movie. I prefer to look at the science myself and make my own interpretations. Which aren't too different from Al Gore's, based on what I've heard, so there isn't much reason to go see AIT. I'd rather look at an opposing viewpoint and determine if they have something valid. What seems to be overlooked here, is that Al Gore didn't win this himself, he's a co-winner along with hundreds or thousands that worked in the IPCC. I think they're the real deal, doing the science, and he's their publicist in a way.
     
  16. Stev0

    Stev0 Honorary Hong Kong Cavalier

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2006
    7,201
    1,073
    0
    Location:
    Northampton, MA
    Vehicle:
    2022 Prius Prime
    Model:
    Plug-in Base
    We have to look at the Fair and Balanced evidence.

    Hundreds of professionally trained climatologists say that climate change is real, and that humans are affecting it. On the other hand, some guy who goes by the name of KewlDude has a blog that says it's not real. Who am I to believe?
     
  17. apriusfan

    apriusfan New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    6,050
    205
    0
    Location:
    S.F. Bay Area
    Vehicle:
    2007 Prius
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(efusco @ Oct 12 2007, 07:51 AM) [snapback]524603[/snapback]</div>
    +1.

    And that is probably the single greatest reason why Al gore will not run for President - doing so will detract from the message he is carrying on the environment. As President, Al Gore would have to focus on a myriad of things in addition to the environment (Iraq is one cesspool that he would have to handle that contributes nothing to the environment....). As Al Gore, Nobel Peace Prize laureate, he can put all of his energy into something that he demonstrably enjoys. Life is too short to have to put up with the crap from the neocons. Let some other aspiring leader handle that chore.
     
  18. nerfer

    nerfer A young senior member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2006
    2,507
    237
    28
    Location:
    Chicagoland, IL, USA, Earth
    Vehicle:
    Other Hybrid
    Model:
    N/A
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(TimBikes @ Oct 12 2007, 10:31 AM) [snapback]524639[/snapback]</div>
    It was a partial victory for the people filing the suit (this was in England BTW). It doesn't stop the film from being shown, but requires a warning that other viewpoints exist and some statements may be exaggerated. I haven't seen AIT, but this list of so-called errors seems to be rather badly biased itself.
    Perhaps misleading because of the phrase "in the near future". If it does melt, that would happen.
    Inundated is a strong word, but beach erosion is happening on many atolls, as well as higher storm surges. I don't know of any evacuations at this time, but islanders are obviously concerned and wondering how much they should put into storm breaks when their whole island is only a few feet above sea level and may require evacuation eventually anyway.
    It seems to be already slowing down. It could potentially be shut down for all practical purposes, which would obviously be a big deal to England. It looks like this has happened rather suddenly in the past. The IPCC was deliberately being conservative in their estimates, and received flack for it in some instances, especially for the rate of Greenland glacier melting (there was late-breaking news on that when the report came out), which directly impacts this conveyor belt.
    There's a definite correlation. I don't know I'd call it an exact fit, but there's a very strong connection that cannot be denied.
    Global climate change is the average global change and hard to pin on specific local events or day-to-day weather. It's likely global warming affected it, but hard to prove. Depending on how Gore phrased it, I could side with the judge.
    Same as above.
    Same as above. The number of hurricanes per year seems to be increasing as the oceans get warmer, so it is more likely that stronger and more numerous hurricanes will occur as global warming goes along, but to say a particular one happened solely because of global warming is disingenuous.
    Polar bears are being stressed because of changes in their environment are more severe than elsewhere, but I don't know about this particular example. Walruses for instance have moved to giving birth on shores rather than ice packs, but this may put them out of range of the good food sources and expose them to new predators.
    What's wrong with this? Bleaching because of global warming and other factors sounds to me like what the IPCC said. Coral can't migrate and they're being hit in many cases by more than one stress factor, so they are bleaching. This is happening and well-documented. Again the IPCC is being conservative because they are scientists and won't claim something has actually happened unless they have complete proof. If there's still a 10% chance of another factor causing it, then they use words like "very likely".
     
  19. Devil's Advocate

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2005
    922
    13
    1
    Location:
    Las Vegas, Nevada
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
  20. Alric

    Alric New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2006
    1,526
    87
    0
    Vehicle:
    2007 Prius
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(TimBikes @ Oct 12 2007, 10:42 AM) [snapback]524646[/snapback]</div>
    The only difference is that "Swindle" does not represent the scientific consensus but "AIT" does. By definition in science class you can only teach the current scientific consensus not what Kewldud's blog says.