Anyone more cautious about comments?0

You should, It's hilarious.

The greatest problem with a dash cam is that in the event of an accident, it will be taken as evidence against you. In rare cases, if it involves evidence that would exculpate, LE may destroy it.

I believe the broader problem your question suggests is that video and audio recording devices you buy and that are manufactured by people to whom your privacy isn't a concern, may be on when you didn't know they were working. That problem may be increased by a sense that governments and tech service providers aren't always distinguishable in operation. Being hit with ads about something you just talked about is annoying, but not the most harmful potential result.

With what we already know about how media/tech companies operated during covid lockdowns, how Internal Revenue handled non-profits under Lerner, and how LE may view defendant rights during even mundane traffic stops, it seems entirely reasonable to treat audio and video surveillance with caution.

What is less reasonable is to expect to work online in real life efforts to obstruct LE, and think that you were doing it privately. The internet is a virtual public square. Planning a criminal conspiracy like some of those involved in J6 and recent antifa/ICE efforts in that public square invites enforcement against criminal planning.

TLDR: If it's something you would be ashamed to say in public, don't post it.

 

Post it? I'm talking about talking to myself, the TV, the laptop, the phone, and so on. So, you have to be totally silent? Serenity Now!

 

You don't have to be silent, but if you litter your environment with devices that you know listen to you, you can't be shocked when they are used to listen to you.

People invite third parties into their lives for mere convenience. Orwell envisioned a brutal state that monitored people involuntarily. Apparently, the only necessary inducement was access to cat videos while we drive.