I blame it on all that calculus I had to take in college. Huh, they tested nuclear weapons in Lake Michigan? Yep, I was there on a somewhat related contract. Not that scary, I figured if anything went Tango Uniform it would be over pretty quickly anyway
So, does anybody have an opinion on all those abandoned FUDS in Canada that have *not* been cleaned up? Or is that best handled in another thread?
Now I know that helmet is too tight. You have gone from American to English to German. Add a Prussian spike to it. Tom
Here is an example of a Cold War radar site, the Mid Canada Line station at Winisk, Ontario. The site is almost on the shore of Hudson's Bay. According to reports, a high level of DRO, RRO, GRO, BTEX, and PCB contamination. http://www.lswilson.ca/winiskmap.jpg http://www.lswilson.ca/winisk5.jpg http://www.lswilson.ca/winisk6.jpg http://www.lswilson.ca/winisk7.jpg http://www.lswilson.ca/winisk-60.jpg It was abandoned in the mid 1960's, and to this day just sits there A 1998 photo of the hanger http://www.lswilson.ca/winisk9.jpg At one time, it was common to airlift in barrels of DFA (Diesel Fuel - Arctic) to radar sites. The barrels were just dumped in place http://www.lswilson.ca/winiskpic20.jpg The station sign is still standing http://www.lswilson.ca/winiskpic30.jpg Most of the interior rooms are in surprisingly good shape, considering they've been sitting abandoned for 45 years http://www.lswilson.ca/winiskpic31.jpg The base had it's own airfield as it was a "sector control" base, which tendered the remote doppler sites http://www.lswilson.ca/winiskpic42.jpg Another view of the control tower http://www.lswilson.ca/winiskctltwr.jpg The fire hall is still standing, with 50's vintage fire trucks still parked inside http://www.lswilson.ca/winisk11.jpg Barracks are still standing http://www.lswilson.ca/winisk14.jpg All the 50's vintage electronics gear - full of mercury and pcb's - is left in place http://www.lswilson.ca/mcl-415a.jpg This is the extent the Canadian federal government and Ontario provincial government have gone to to ensure the "safety" of the area http://www.lswilson.ca/winiskpic43.jpg
Interesting - I have the opposite experience. I bought a handful of n:Vision spotlights from Home Depot and they are very dim when turned on and take about 30 seconds to generate good light. Haven't tried any GE bulbs. On the other hand, I bought a bunch of Feit spirals from Costco (got about a dozen for $6) and these all turn on with nearly full brightness and are some of the best I've used. So I wonder if the n:Vision non-enclosed CFLs are OK for some reason... the spots I have just have a normal looking spiral CFL on the inside.
Actually, no, you did not, the globes and spotilights suck in all CFL variants I've tried as I've stated several times. You are making an apples to oranges comparison. Note that Tripp has reported good results with some globe Panasonics coming on at full intensity (that I have not tested), so there is hope that eventually we will see more decent makes available in these enclosures. Therefore, it appears that there is not a good technical reason for the problem, just inferior design choices. Same is true for the non-instant on behavior of GE's and many other brands of CFL's--an inferior design choice. The n:vision non-enclosed CFL's work great, the best I've tested in terms of instant-on and full brightness. Nearly all of my "workhorse" standard CFL's are n:vision now. So far the life of them appears to be good, although I had a bad package about 4 years ago when they were still labeled "Commercial Electric" that failed in a very short time--warranty replacements from the store are still going strong. I do notice a faint high pitched electrical hum in some of the n:visions. I've got around 40 n:visions in service at the moment in soft white with a few bright whites, and in 40, 60, and 100W equivalents. Also, the n:visions are shorter than the GE's, so they fit more applications. The Sylvania micro-mini's are even smaller in both length and diameter and are very good CFL's in their own right. They are a hair slower/less consistent on instant-on than the n:visions and some come up a bit below full illumination, although not objectionably so like the enclosure type CFL's I've tested.