1. Attachments are working again! Check out this thread for more details and to report any other bugs.

Featured Ethanol Industry Outlook for 2017

Discussion in 'Prius, Hybrid, EV and Alt-Fuel News' started by Trollbait, Apr 3, 2017.

  1. Trollbait

    Trollbait It's a D&D thing

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2006
    21,742
    11,327
    0
    Location:
    eastern Pennsylvania
    Vehicle:
    Other Non-Hybrid
    #1 Trollbait, Apr 3, 2017
  2. austingreen

    austingreen Senior Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2009
    13,533
    4,063
    0
    Location:
    Austin, TX, USA
    Vehicle:
    2018 Tesla Model 3
    Model:
    N/A
    ethanol industry my come to a screeching halt in the US if pruitt (EPA) and perry (DOE) want it to. Both have allegiances to oil, and with oil around $50/bbl oil and north american production of oil high, higher ethanol mandates make little economic, environmental, or security sense.

    My guess is unless ethanol costs go down, or oil costs go up, mandates will be pulled back. They are up for 2017 and 2018, but my guess is 2018's mandate will get rolled back, and that may be a good thing.
    EPA Increases The Federal Ethanol Mandate | The Daily Caller
     
    #2 austingreen, Apr 4, 2017
  3. Trollbait

    Trollbait It's a D&D thing

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2006
    21,742
    11,327
    0
    Location:
    eastern Pennsylvania
    Vehicle:
    Other Non-Hybrid
    I haven't heard otherwise, but oil companies don't have legal protections against lawsuits if high ethanol levels damaged a car. another reason for them to be against the mandate. I'm alright with the mandate getting rolled back if it doesn't allow for other alcohols.

    Really, if we are going to go ethanol, we should stop pussy footing around it and just do it. E30 is the point at which phase separation is no longer a concern, and it might have better efficiency per energy content(btu) in current flex fuel engines than straight gas. I think engine generations are on a ten year cycle, so let's give everybody ten years before switching. The manufacturers aren't starting from scratch if they sell in Brazil. In the mean time, let's switch to RON for octane, and bump the regular limit up a bit.
     
    #3 Trollbait, Apr 4, 2017
  4. bisco

    bisco cookie crumbler

    Joined:
    May 11, 2005
    107,781
    48,985
    0
    Location:
    boston
    Vehicle:
    2012 Prius Plug-in
    Model:
    Plug-in Base
    will the mexico corn embargo affect any of this?
     
    #4 bisco, Apr 4, 2017
    RCO likes this.
  5. Trollbait

    Trollbait It's a D&D thing

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2006
    21,742
    11,327
    0
    Location:
    eastern Pennsylvania
    Vehicle:
    Other Non-Hybrid
    NAFTA crushed Mexico's local corn farmers; the embargo is them not buying US corn. So if farmers stick to growing the same amount of corn, there will be more for domestic consumption. Then some ethanol plants are already using other crops. Winter barley is one, and sorghum is another, but the Chinese might have bought all that up already.

    I don't think switching from corn is a technical hurdle, but more a financial one. The answer to that will likely be for the plants to start making products more valuable than animal feed from the leftovers of ethanol production.
     
    #5 Trollbait, Apr 4, 2017
    bisco likes this.
  6. austingreen

    austingreen Senior Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2009
    13,533
    4,063
    0
    Location:
    Austin, TX, USA
    Vehicle:
    2018 Tesla Model 3
    Model:
    N/A
    It could make ethanol cheaper and give the current administration a reason to go against their free market principals, and do a corn protectionist mandate. Trump did campaign in iowa in favor of big mandates, but in other states for froe markets for fossil fuels. I Think administration is on every side of the issue and has no principals.

    My guess is a trade war with mexico will hurt tens of thousands of american jobs and congress won't let it happen.

    I am in favor of an open fuel standard where new cars are made to be able to burn methanol and ethanol blends safely. That is quite different from a mandate for this year where most cars can not safely burn these higher levels, and economically and environmentally much higher ethanol blends are likely worse for america in general.
     
    #6 austingreen, Apr 4, 2017
  7. Trollbait

    Trollbait It's a D&D thing

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2006
    21,742
    11,327
    0
    Location:
    eastern Pennsylvania
    Vehicle:
    Other Non-Hybrid
    Our ethanol mandate is half assed. There is no incentive to make engines actually take advantage of ethanol's higher octane.
     
    #7 Trollbait, Apr 5, 2017
  8. wjtracy

    wjtracy Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2006
    11,314
    3,588
    1
    Location:
    Northern VA (NoVA)
    Vehicle:
    Other Hybrid
    Model:
    N/A
    The EPA in recent years has been tone deaf to industry concerns about reaching the 10% blend wall etc.
    "Damn the torpedos full speed ahead" has been EPA strategy when their plans seemed impossible to achieve.
    Basially EPA has been strongly favoring ethanol lobby position.

    So I think we can at least expect a moderation of approach.

    Many years ago there was a lot of R&D activity on other alcohols and ethers etc. for gasoline. Many things can be used, but that goes against King Corn and we can see MTBE had issues. There is no fundamental advantage for oxygenates in gasoline. It does not burn cleaner, etc. It is just a policy choice matter. 100% Gasoline is generally cheaper, cleaner, better for environment overall. We have to make-up political policy rationale to promote anything other than gasoline. and of course many do feel mandated alternate energy is the correct policy.
     
    #8 wjtracy, Apr 13, 2017
  9. Samprocat

    Samprocat Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2017
    491
    297
    0
    Location:
    Lincoln, NE
    Vehicle:
    2017 Prius Prime
    Model:
    Prime Plus
    And by 2020 many will seek BEV car's ...At least I will be 100% electric ...and move my pump time to my garage and enjoy my family time

    Posted via the PriusChat mobile app.
     
    #9 Samprocat, Apr 13, 2017
  10. Trollbait

    Trollbait It's a D&D thing

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2006
    21,742
    11,327
    0
    Location:
    eastern Pennsylvania
    Vehicle:
    Other Non-Hybrid
    Oxygenates date back to when carburetors where what most cars on the road had, and they helped then, but don't have the same benefit with fuel injection. While there are still some of these cars on the road, they generally aren't driven the miles a daily commuter car is driven. Taking lead out of gasoline wasn't good for cars with soft metal valves, but there we did it anyway. We should focus on gasoline standards that improve emissions and efficiency in cars being sold now; not the dwindling numbers of leisure automobiles out there.

    Pure gasoline is still a fossil fuel, and direct renewable replacements for it aren't as along as they are for diesel. Since diesels cost more, and many people have negative opinions of them, we need to keep an open mind on possible fuel replacements for spark ignition engines. I'd like to have an open fuel mandate, but I also would like to see the US switch to RON for octane ratings and bump regular up a little on that front.
     
    #10 Trollbait, Apr 13, 2017
  11. vvillovv

    vvillovv Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2013
    3,536
    1,245
    1
    Location:
    NY
    Vehicle:
    2017 Prius Prime
    Model:
    Prime Plus
    I agree ! That would be SUV and Pickup in the US. I shouldn't add GMO to this old convers, and if GMO were only used as a fuel source than no worries about how it's produced. So than it should be a non issue.
     
    #11 vvillovv, Feb 8, 2018
(You must log in or sign up to post here.)