1. Attachments are working again! Check out this thread for more details and to report any other bugs.

EV are the worst polluters over time?

Discussion in 'Environmental Discussion' started by Diemaster, Apr 24, 2019.

  1. fuzzy1

    fuzzy1 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2009
    17,035
    10,010
    90
    Location:
    Western Washington
    Vehicle:
    Other Hybrid
    Model:
    N/A
    Such would be very useful and informative ...
     
  2. hill

    hill High Fiber Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2005
    19,602
    8,034
    54
    Location:
    Montana & Nashville, TN
    Vehicle:
    2004 Prius
    Model:
    IV
    data .... it can't compete if your synaptic pathways have been volitionally carboned-up.
    [​IMG]

    .
     
    fuzzy1 likes this.
  3. Trollbait

    Trollbait It's a D&D thing

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2006
    21,590
    11,212
    0
    Location:
    eastern Pennsylvania
    Vehicle:
    Other Non-Hybrid
    The worse case metric used in the study that lead to the OP head line.
    @bwilson4web posted a link over here, Electric vehicles emit more CO2 than diesel ones, German study shows | PriusChat
    Best case metric gave the electric the advantage.

    The conclusion of the summary favored neither BEV nor diesel though. It reached methane ICE as the lowest cost reduction of carbon emissions, even when using fossil fuels, and a fleet of such cars could allow the storage of peak wind and solar energy electric with methane production from it.

    Note that the study was focused on Germany. So conclusions may not apply elsewhere.
     
  4. padroo

    padroo Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2008
    2,763
    2,250
    13
    Location:
    Chesterton, Indiana Another third world country.
    Vehicle:
    2016 Prius
    Model:
    Four
    I like the idea that pollution can be taken care of at the power plant instead of everyone having to take their car in for an individual pollution test. Get the government out of my tailpipe. :)
     
  5. hill

    hill High Fiber Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2005
    19,602
    8,034
    54
    Location:
    Montana & Nashville, TN
    Vehicle:
    2004 Prius
    Model:
    IV
    equally, if not more important - there is a significant ratio of plugin drivers that supplement their homes with solar, as we do;
    https://www.solarunitedneighbors.org/news/survey-examines-solars-strong-connection-electric-vehicles/

    It's one of many reasons why the op's link is disingenuous. Unfortunately, these reports of ridiculousness often take a decade or more to go away - & then, some people are still duped - even after that much time passes.
    .
     
    HPrimeAdvanced likes this.
  6. padroo

    padroo Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2008
    2,763
    2,250
    13
    Location:
    Chesterton, Indiana Another third world country.
    Vehicle:
    2016 Prius
    Model:
    Four
    Unfortunately, it's the world we live in.
     
  7. VFerdman

    VFerdman Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2017
    1,148
    1,171
    3
    Location:
    Western Massachusetts
    Vehicle:
    2007 Prius
    Model:
    Three
    I am not seeing all that many Bummer H1's on the road, yet Prii (of all generations) are ubiquitous. Also, H1 led to H2 and H3, which were even worse abominations than H1, which was a purpose built military vehicle. Gen 1 Prius led to gen 2, gen 3 and now gen 4 Prii, which are amazing cars with amazing track record.

    Someone take that idiot to task!
     
    HPrimeAdvanced likes this.
  8. VFerdman

    VFerdman Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2017
    1,148
    1,171
    3
    Location:
    Western Massachusetts
    Vehicle:
    2007 Prius
    Model:
    Three
    As was mentioned above, BEVs are better than ICE cars because they hold the POTENTIAL to improve our emissions without replacing the whole fleet. As electric sources get cleaner, the BEV fleet necessarily gets cleaner. It's that simple and I am not sure why it's so difficult to understand. Why is this not mentioned more in such arguments? By adopting a BEV culture we are setting up for cleaner environment, but if we stubbornly stick with ICE we are in a dead end situation (just a matter of time). ICE technology has reached its pinnacle and there is not much left on the table in terms of improvement of emissions or efficiency. This argument can and should be refined to the point where a child could understand it and put out there into the cultural lore.
     
    HPrimeAdvanced and Sarge like this.
  9. bwilson4web

    bwilson4web BMW i3 and Model 3

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2005
    27,066
    15,372
    0
    Location:
    Huntsville AL
    Vehicle:
    2017 Prius Prime
    Model:
    Prime Plus
    Most English articles are going to be summaries of the original German. Like FOX, they will omit facts that don't match their editorial opinions. My recommendation is those are "Cliff Notes" and the original should be read.

    The original, German language paper: https://www.cesifo-group.de/DocDL/sd-2019-08-sinn-karl-buchal-motoren-2019-04-25.pdf

    1. The continuation of the energy transition and its pre-programmed Crisis in the transport sector
    2. The structure of German electricity production
    3. The CO2 emissions of alternative engines

    3.1 The diesel engine
    3.2 The battery electric motor
    3.3 fuel cells or batteries?
    4. Two possible scenarios for the electrification of the traffic
    5. The problem of volatility and the need of parallel structures
    6. Excessive current spikes and the role of the hydrogen
    7. Concluding remarks

    The paper is too large for the 1 MB limited Google translate. But we can examine the appropriate sections to see how the authors approached the problem.

    One early problem in the opening abstract is:

    . . . There are two advantages to using hydrogen-methane technology. For one thing, it is the only way to save the long term excessive current peaks of wind and solar power, which is required when the Market shares of this form of renewable electricity. On the other hand even from the standpoint, it offers the possibility of considerable CO2 savings, even if this methane comes from fossil sources.

    So tell me how many diesels are running on "hydrogen-methane"?

    Bob Wilson
     
    HPrimeAdvanced likes this.
  10. hill

    hill High Fiber Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2005
    19,602
    8,034
    54
    Location:
    Montana & Nashville, TN
    Vehicle:
    2004 Prius
    Model:
    IV
    Had to drive the better ½ down to the mother-in-law's house last weekend. San Diego County. Sure glad it was all on PV electrons.
    But sheesh!
    1556218264343.jpeg
    It's looking nasty out there for fossil fuel burners. .... it's a shame electric cars are dirtier than an ice. But now that I know burning fuel is cleaner - well - I guess it's worth it

    .
     
    reallyreal likes this.
  11. Trollbait

    Trollbait It's a D&D thing

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2006
    21,590
    11,212
    0
    Location:
    eastern Pennsylvania
    Vehicle:
    Other Non-Hybrid
    That slogan works for other issues.

    We can essentially run the reformation process used to make hydrogen from fossil fuels in reverse.
    Carbon dioxide and water, plus some energy input, and you have hydrocarbons. Audi has two pilot plants doing this; one makes methane, and the other a synthetic light, sweet petroleum(the call it blue crude). The energy input is excess renewable electricity.

    That is likely what the German researchers are referring to with the "hydrogen-methane" phrase. Plenty of commercial vehicles already use natural gas as fuel, and both gasoline a diesel engines can be converted to run on it.

    From the translations you posted, it sounds like the paper's conclusion for a cost effective way for Germany to reduce carbon emissions from the transportation fleet would be to switch the fleet over methane. Even with natural gas, there will be a reduction, and they can switch to synthetic methane has more renewable electricity production comes to the market.

    I suspect gas will be $4 a gallon here next week.
     
  12. JimboPalmer

    JimboPalmer Tsar of all the Rushers

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2009
    12,470
    6,862
    2
    Location:
    Greenwood MS USA
    Vehicle:
    2012 Prius v wagon
    Model:
    Three
    You will hear detractors say "Fix the grid, THEN we can have electric cars." But the truth is you can buy now, and once we fix the grid, those cars get fixed, too.
     
  13. VFerdman

    VFerdman Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2017
    1,148
    1,171
    3
    Location:
    Western Massachusetts
    Vehicle:
    2007 Prius
    Model:
    Three
    No, this is not a chicken/egg problem at all. BEVs work perfectly fine with the current grid. As the grid improves BEVs will improve with it and Bummers of the world will still be spewing pollution.
     
    HPrimeAdvanced likes this.
  14. hill

    hill High Fiber Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2005
    19,602
    8,034
    54
    Location:
    Montana & Nashville, TN
    Vehicle:
    2004 Prius
    Model:
    IV
    Don't forget. The same clean or dirty grid also runs the refinery, albeit they use some of their own fuel as well. Still, no one bitches about dirty power used for the refinery. A bit of irony? Or is the dirt simply considered a worthy cause to create fossil fuel.
    .
     
    HPrimeAdvanced, padroo and Trollbait like this.
  15. wjtracy

    wjtracy Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2006
    11,309
    3,586
    1
    Location:
    Northern VA (NoVA)
    Vehicle:
    Other Hybrid
    Model:
    N/A
    It's probably a mistake to try to claim eco-superiority for BEV. as advocate Chelsea Sexton used to say (not sure what she thinks today). We are talking about a value judgement/preference for BEV for performance reasons and for some more ethical fuel choice. I would say Europeans always thought gasoline was wimpy power compared to diesel power, so I think EU will like the extra power of the electric engine, presumably they do not care too much if it is hybrid or BEV as long as it responds with big power upon hitting the "gas" pedal.
     
    wxman likes this.
  16. bwilson4web

    bwilson4web BMW i3 and Model 3

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2005
    27,066
    15,372
    0
    Location:
    Huntsville AL
    Vehicle:
    2017 Prius Prime
    Model:
    Prime Plus
    Ok, here is the 'smoking gun' from the translated paper:

    Work summarizes, appreciate Romare and Dahllöf (2017) that per kWh battery capacity between 145 kg and 195 kg of CO2 equivalents be ejected.

    So let's put this perspective:
    • "100–265 W·h/kg" - Wikipedia claim
      • 1 kw @100Wh/kg -> 10 kg :: 145 kg - 195 kg CO{2}
      • 1 kw @265Wh/kg -> 3.8 kg :: 145 kg - 195 kg CO{2}
    The primary problem is the paper claims CO{2} output that is 14.5 - 51.3 times the weight of the LiON battery. So they cited:


    I'm seeing some suspicious references in this paper and it even claims there are a wide range of numbers:

    University/Institute Researchers Active in the area (based on assessed reports)
    1 Argonne National Laboratory USA Dunn Gaines Kelly James Gallagher 2000 -
    2 Chalmers University of Technology Sweden Nordelöf Tillman Ljunggren Söderman Rydh Kushnir 2005 -
    3 Karlsruhe Institute for Technology Germany Peters Baumann Zimmermann Braun Weil 2016 -
    4 Norwegian University of Science and Technology NTU Trondheim Norway Majeau-Bettez Ellingsen Singh Kumar Srivastava Valöen Hammer Strömman 2011 -
    5 Swerea IVF Sweden Zackrisson Avellán Orlenius 2010 -
    6 United States Environmental Protection Agency US-EPA USA Amarakoon Smith Segal 2013
    7 University of California Ambrose Kendall 2016


    Ok, it is unfair to call BS until reading the papers. However, I would point out a lot of these papers are snapshots in time. My experience is:
    • Internet reports - shortest time between observations and report BUT risks credibility (including this post)
    • Magazine articles - typically a 3-9 month delay between observations and report with improved credibility
    • Formal papers - typically a 12-18 month delay between observations and report with the best, but not perfect, credibility
    I am bothered by seeing more than an order of magnitude more CO{2} than the mass of the battery. Furthermore, this graph of the cost per kWh:
    [​IMG]

    Bob Wilson
     
  17. bwilson4web

    bwilson4web BMW i3 and Model 3

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2005
    27,066
    15,372
    0
    Location:
    Huntsville AL
    Vehicle:
    2017 Prius Prime
    Model:
    Prime Plus
    BTW, this is what Tesla reports:
    https://www.tesla.com/ns_videos/tesla-impact-report-2019.pdf

    Unlike our Fremont Factory which was purchased and renovated, Tesla
    designed and built from the ground up our Gigafactory 1, a battery and
    motor manufacturing facility in Sparks, Nevada, allowing us to design
    and implement sustainable solutions throughout the site from the
    beginning. Gigafactory 1 began mass production of lithium-ion battery
    cells in January 2017 and started manufacturing Model 3 battery packs
    and drive units in mid-2018. At 15M sq ft, Gigafactory 1 will be the
    world's largest building by footprint when completed and will eventually
    be powered by 100% renewable energy sources. Tesla built Gigafactory
    1 with an efficient lighting design utilizing high-efficiency LED light
    fixtures combined with an optimized layout that reduces the facility’s
    overall electrical load. Gigafactory 1’s current lighting power density is
    0.45 watts per sq ft, which is 65% less than the American Society of
    Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE)
    lighting design allowance of 1.3 watts per sq ft for a manufacturing
    facility. In the course of 30 days, the facility’s lighting system can save
    144 MWhs of energy – enough energy for a Model S to drive 480K
    miles. Designed to be a net-zero energy factory upon completion,
    the facility will have the largest rooftop solar array in the world, with
    roughly 200K solar panels. Solar installation is already underway,
    in addition to a microgrid R&D facility.

    pp. 16 has an interesting graph that if we use the 2017 production numbers we could back-in to the cost per kWh.

    Bob Wilson
     
    Tideland Prius likes this.
  18. bwilson4web

    bwilson4web BMW i3 and Model 3

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2005
    27,066
    15,372
    0
    Location:
    Huntsville AL
    Vehicle:
    2017 Prius Prime
    Model:
    Prime Plus
    Source: New study claiming electric cars are dirtier than diesel debunked - Electrek

    However, the Ifo Institute for Economic Research came out earlier this month with a new study again using the same argument that dirty electricity is making electric cars worse for the environment than diesel:

    “Considering Germany’s current energy mix and the amount of energy used in battery production, the CO2 emissions of battery-electric vehicles are, in the best case, slightly higher than those of a diesel engine, and are otherwise much higher.”

    The professors behind the study were instead pushing for hydrogen-methane vehicles.

    Notably, Germany currently uses more coal power than most of Europe, and is one of the dirtier grids in Europe, but is cleaning up more quickly than most. By 2030 – when many electric cars sold today will still be in service – Germany plans to produce 2/3 of their energy by renewables.

    The problem is that the IFO’s study makes many of the same mistakes as other studies used electric vehicle detractors in the past.
    . . .

    Do we need to waste time any longer on this terribly flawed 'paper'?

    Bob Wilson
     
  19. tochatihu

    tochatihu Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2004
    8,972
    3,501
    0
    Location:
    Kunming Yunnan China
    Vehicle:
    2001 Prius
    A general understanding of lithium supply that may have some errors.

    Most starts as brines under saline lake beds. Dried to mixed salts by solar evaporation.

    Purified to lithium carbonate, presently involving fossil energy. Several process improvements are being examined. A company that felt like it could probably switch over to renewable power for these steps.

    Big bags of lithium carbonate are made into batteries. At least Tesla plans to solarize this process as stated @37.

    The whole shebang could be done with CO2 emissions only from transporting lithium carbonate, and as that carbonate has to get blown off as CO2 (I think). There may not be another energy-storage technology that could be made so close to CO2 neutral today.
     
    Robert Holt likes this.
  20. Trollbait

    Trollbait It's a D&D thing

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2006
    21,590
    11,212
    0
    Location:
    eastern Pennsylvania
    Vehicle:
    Other Non-Hybrid
    The process for making methane might be treated carbon negative in some models.
    If all the electricity used comes from renewable, carbon free sources.