Featured Threads

Ah yes - the government is best to pick a winner. LOL

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/companies/evgo-nears-1-billion-govt-loan-to-take-on-tesla-s-charging-empire/ar-AA1rEVik

The stops we've made at evgo (either for DC or L2) have always been WAY overpriced per kWh, as well as less reliable compared to superchargers. Even so - . I'm sure the motive to prop up evgo is rational, under the notion of creating competition
.

For those that missed it last night, here's the link. It starts about 53 minutes in, if you don't want to watch the light show.
We, Robot - YouTube

The State of California is mulling over the idea of requiring EVs to be bidirectional. That is, if the system needs power they suck it right back out of your car. The practical considerations would be considerable, and I don't know if the state is actually competent to design or create such a program. Certainly my state couldn't do it.

Bidirectional charging may be required on EVs soon due to new CA law | Electrek

Bill Text - SB-1006 Electricity: transmission capacity: reconductoring and grid-enhancing technologies.

PS:

The law appears to have shifted over into SB 59.