1. Attachments are working again! Check out this thread for more details and to report any other bugs.

High mpg = using brakes

Discussion in 'Gen 2 Prius Fuel Economy' started by andyprius, Aug 30, 2010.

  1. Rokeby

    Rokeby Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2008
    3,033
    708
    75
    Location:
    Ballamer, Merlin
    Vehicle:
    2008 Prius
    ?huH

    (Huh?)

    .for expressions mathematical solely
    used notatioN polisH reversE was
    thought have I for years these alL

    (And for all these years I have thought that
    Reverse Polish Notation was used solely
    for mathematical expressions.)

    [​IMG]

    .myself help couldn't, sorrY ;)
     
  2. SageBrush

    SageBrush Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2008
    11,627
    2,530
    8
    Location:
    Southwest Colorado
    Vehicle:
    2012 Prius v wagon
    Model:
    Two
    I am not sure what OP was trying to say either, but my guess is he discovered the energy saving advantages of driving down a hill slower than 85 mph. Air resistance increases exponentially with speed.
     
  3. Bob64

    Bob64 Sapphire of the Blue Sky

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2007
    1,540
    92
    0
    Location:
    Virginia
    Vehicle:
    2007 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    I guess he found that there is a point where air resistance < energy recovered via regenerative braking.
     
  4. bisco

    bisco cookie crumbler

    Joined:
    May 11, 2005
    108,860
    49,455
    0
    Location:
    boston
    Vehicle:
    2012 Prius Plug-in
    Model:
    Plug-in Base
    more like a lack of, methinks.:eek:
     
  5. dabize

    dabize New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    98
    12
    0
    Location:
    Sudbury, MA
    Vehicle:
    2009 Prius
    Model:
    N/A

    Well, I use the brakes as sparingly as possible, and I've been getting over 60 mpg lately (65-70 since April) under similar conditions (suburban, Prius-friendly driving and a 26 mile (one way) commute. Braking (however light) is clearly associated with a reduction in MPG for me.

    Maybe I misunderstood your meaning - did you mean "high" in the sense of "elevated", or in the sense of "cannabinoid-associated"?