1. Attachments are working again! Check out this thread for more details and to report any other bugs.

*IMO Don't buy a 2K4 Prius and if you own one don't drive it

Discussion in 'Gen 2 Prius Main Forum' started by Frank Hudon, Apr 4, 2004.

  1. Frank Hudon

    Frank Hudon Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2004
    4,147
    18
    0
    Rick the damage occured between the green and red arrows on the right hand side of the battery cover, Metal box. the rib between the arrows is dinted in about 3/4" and the whole cover canted forward. It appears that the plastic tabs on the floor plate where they hook into the lower tray pulled the plate down under the one that's bolted down by the hooks. Also the car didn't stop IE: HV contactor didn't break the circuit to the car so the potential for the car to come live is HV on the battery converter side of thie inverter caused by an internal short in the battery. The impact sensor didn't drop the HV relay in this case. All I'm concerened about is the safety of the people in the car.
     
  2. HTMLSpinnr

    HTMLSpinnr Super Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2003
    5,339
    917
    251
    Location:
    Surprise, AZ (Phoenix)
    Vehicle:
    2018 Tesla Model 3
    Model:
    N/A
    The fact that the car didn't stop would be of concern to me.

    We'd all love to see pictures of the battery casing damage, and I look forward to a response from Toyota. Further looking states that it would make sense that there would be some sort of means for deflecting this up and over - and if that were the case, I would hope that the rear seats are reinforced enough to prevent any further travel, requiring the panel to absorb the energy by crushing.

    Frank - thank you for taking the extra time to explain this after the pictures were posted. I figured if I pointed out various places where things come together that the point could be more clearly illustrated.

    -Rick
     
  3. bookrats

    bookrats New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2004
    2,843
    2
    0
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    I found the following in the Prius Classic (not '04) Emergency Response Guide (revised). Don't know if it's still true for the '04 Prius or not, but thought it might be of help.

    "(n)" numbers refer to the diagram mentioned at the end.

    It comes with an electrical diagram of the High Voltage Safety System following this, but I haven't figured out a way to upload it.
     
  4. norman

    norman New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2004
    77
    0
    0
    Location:
    Australia
    Yahoo is down at the moment, when it comes up I'll be able to access and post the '04 Prius Emergency Response Guide URL.

    A photo would speak a thousand words.

    If I understand Frank's description correctly, the plastic trunk tray was pushed forward and wedged "under" the bolted down tray (which sits over the battery) and as a result, the trunk tray dented the battery casing and risked "crushing" the internal battery modules.

    Frank, please correct me if I'm wrong, but if I'm correct, the electical risk was between the heavy metal battery casing and the internal battery cells. Had the intrusion been sufficient, a cell could have been breached and contacted the "grounded" battery casing.

    I wonder what has been "designed" to happen if this was to occur.
     
  5. plusaf

    plusaf plusaf

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2004
    324
    5
    0
    Location:
    Raleigh, NC
    Vehicle:
    2004 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    my brain just took a fresh look at the problem and, as my website says, i synthesized a novel approach to the solution (imnsho :))...

    first, i'll trust toyota engineers to have made the car safe under these collision conditions. i'll (dangerous move) assume that they thought of these failure modes....

    on the other hand, taking a new view, rather than change the design of the floor plate so that it doesn't hit the battery case, how about a redesign of the battery compartment so that if it IS hit to the point of potential damage, perhaps it "breaks away" from its surroundings and falls or moves to a safe place where it can't be shorted or create a "hotwired" condition to the chassis, etc.??????

    i.e, if you can't keep the battery from being whacked, control what it does if it DOES get smacked....

    so, where are the TM engineers browsing this site????
    :D
     
  6. genalex

    genalex Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2004
    265
    1
    0
    Location:
    Jersey suburbs of Phila.
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    I couldn't open the jpgs, but am I oversimplifying in thinking that a quick, easy ( and cheap) fix would be to replace the trouble-causing plastic cover plate with a material/thickness that had low shear strength and would buckle/fold/wrinkle or whatever rather than tearing loose or moving out of place, intact, to create further damage and hazard?
     
  7. norman

    norman New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2004
    77
    0
    0
    Location:
    Australia
  8. HTMLSpinnr

    HTMLSpinnr Super Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2003
    5,339
    917
    251
    Location:
    Surprise, AZ (Phoenix)
    Vehicle:
    2018 Tesla Model 3
    Model:
    N/A
    I'm going to say that the HV fuse located within the module would protect the car from going "hot" in case of intrusion then. Check out pages 15-16 within this guide for further details.

    Perhaps Toyota still needs to address the crush capability of this floor panel, however at the same time, they may not want to compomise the load (cargo) carrying capability. Plastic in the end will deform to some degree.

    I'm interested to see how they respond to this none the less.
     
  9. Bob Allen

    Bob Allen Captainbaba

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2004
    1,273
    11
    0
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    Vehicle:
    2004 Prius
    I have several thoughts. We all run the risk of being tailgated. I had my perfectly fine 86 Escort tailgated by a woman who was on her cell phone. She rear ended me at a stoplight and bent the bumper down and crumpled the wheel well. The car was driveable, but the insurance company totalled it anyway. I bought it back from the insurance company for 100 bucks and sold it for 400 bucks to a friend who drove it for five more years. Point is, no car is going to be safe from this kind of accident. That's not a reason to not drive a Prius.
    My second thought is that because of the scarcity of Prii, hinted at by the post I am quoting, it's unlikely that a totalled Prius could be replaced by another Prius unless the owner were willing to go through the whole horrible wait process again and assuming there would even be a Prius available.
    I wonder about the scarcity issue affecting repairs, not replacement of the whole car. What about getting body panels replaced, etc.? Would we be out of a car for weeks while the dealer ordered parts and would the dealer be able to get parts for these rare birds?
    I'm really saddened by Frank's experience and glad his wife was not seriously injured. After reading all these posts, however, I don't feel that the car is unsafe nor that I shouldn't continue driving it.
    And, Frank, was the driver of the car that hit your Prius using a cell phone at the time? Several states and many insurance companies, consider cell phone use while driving as contributory neglience.
    Good luck, Frank, and keep us posted.
    Bob
     
  10. Danny

    Danny Admin/Founder
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2003
    7,093
    2,107
    1,174
    Location:
    Charlotte, NC
    Vehicle:
    2013 Prius Plug-in
    Model:
    Plug-in Base
    Two things:

    1) I don't think it's body panels or really anything that Toyota's manufacturing that is keeping the orders backlogged - from what I understand it's the 3rd party components, such as the main battery that are taking so long to be produced. Body panels should be easy to obtain, although the dealer might need to order them from Japan since this car is so new (perhaps they have some in each region's POI, I don't know - Dianne, you out there?)

    2) In South Carolina, at least, if you hit someone from behind it's your fault no matter what the story is. My friend was driving on a wet road one night and didn't notice that there was someone turning left in the same lane he was in since the car turning left was actually 2 cars up and the car behind the car turning didn't have his brake lights on. At any rate, my friend rearended the Jeep (Car #2) which rear-ended the Lexus (Turning car, Car #1) and my friend was rear-ended by an Acura (Car #4). The whole accident was caused by my friend, but all he had to worry about was the crappy 80s Jeep and he got ticketed for following too closely. Then the Jeep guy had to pay for the Lexus and the Dr's bills of the guy in the Lexus who didn't have his seatbelt on and got tossed around a bit - he also got ticketed for following too closely. Then finally the Acura had to pay for my friend's Explorer because she rear-ended him, and she got a ticket for following too closely as well.

    Sucks for everyone except for my friend, who in reality should've been responsible for all 4 of the wrecked cars. Poor girl in the rear really got screwed because there wasn't anyone behind her to hit her.
     
  11. fredr500

    fredr500 Junior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2004
    13
    0
    0
    AdminCoop said
    2) In South Carolina, at least, if you hit someone from behind it's your fault no matter what the story is.


    I know from experience in New Mexico that's not the case. I was exiting an interstate to a rest area when the car in front of me stopped on the ramp. I hit him hard enough to activate my air bag and break his rear window.

    I got the ticket as expected. The next day the passengers in the front car went to the police and explained that the car I hit was a new car on a demo drive by the salesman, and he had just said "Watch how the ABS works" and took his hands off the wheel and slammed on the brakes.

    My ticket was dismissed, he was cited for reckless driving. (I was in a rental, I had free collision coverage from my company plan, Hertz paid all my expenses including many chiropractor visits, had a replacement in under an hour. AAA paid for hotels and meals on the way home since it was over 100 miles away and I needed to not drive any more that day.)

    So not every rear-end collision is the fault of the back car.

    Fred
     
  12. HTMLSpinnr

    HTMLSpinnr Super Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2003
    5,339
    917
    251
    Location:
    Surprise, AZ (Phoenix)
    Vehicle:
    2018 Tesla Model 3
    Model:
    N/A
    I'm inclined to agree with the other posters here. While it's a concern that this piece caused damaged so far inward, and perhaps it needs to be examined and changed, I don't feel that this should exclude this car as a consideration.

    What's more alarming, however, is the cost of repairs for seemingly minor to moderate collisions.

    I would personally be quite insistant that my car was *not* totaled in the event of a costly repair unless the car wouldn't drive the same or the cost far exceeded the replacement value. The insurance company needs to consider the fact that these cars are difficult to acquire, and that one would be without their car for some time trying to obtain a replacement.
     
  13. Danny

    Danny Admin/Founder
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2003
    7,093
    2,107
    1,174
    Location:
    Charlotte, NC
    Vehicle:
    2013 Prius Plug-in
    Model:
    Plug-in Base
    I actually totally disagree, if the situation allows and I had another car that was usable until another Prius could be obtained, I would have the car totaled in an instant.

    You have to look at many factors, even though I agree the fact that the Prius is so hard to find right now is definitely one to think about when deciding to have the car totaled out or not:

    1) this is a new redesign of a very intricate car. A body shop will probably not be able to rebuild the car to factory specs, and the components that you put into the car (if you have to replace the battery) could take months to get.
    2) The car will never be valued the same again. Your resale value will be seriously compromised if you have the car rebuilt. If you do have it rebuilt make sure that you have the car valued and go to the insurance company to obtain a "Loss of Value" claim.
     
  14. m4prius

    m4prius New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2004
    59
    0
    0
    Location:
    Ohio
    Vehicle:
    2011 Prius
    Model:
    Three
    htmlspinnr,

    I would be more concerned about people safety than car replacement. Cars and parts can be replaced but people or injury cannot!!!

    If the plastic part is too weak then it will move and can slice into the battery...maybe the fix is to replace the single plastic part with a two piece bolted metal/foam piece , the metal would add more structural stiffness and foam part could add an air gap between the stiffened metal and the battery (crushable foam). Metal--->Foam---->Battery

    It would be nice to get an official Toyota comment on rear end accidents and safety functions within the car (battery, crush zones, power cut-off or emergency power cut-off).

    It would also be nice to have a covered emergency cut-off button next to the power button...that way any anyone could CUT power to the motor/inverter/batteries in the invent of an accident/emergency situation...hidden buttons or complex shutoff procedures become difficult.



    Mike
     
  15. HTMLSpinnr

    HTMLSpinnr Super Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2003
    5,339
    917
    251
    Location:
    Surprise, AZ (Phoenix)
    Vehicle:
    2018 Tesla Model 3
    Model:
    N/A
    I didn't intend to imply that the ins. company should return an unsafe vehicle that didn't meet or exceed factory specs - just that an effort to restore the car should be made considering the difficulty in acquiring a new replacement.
     
  16. Danny

    Danny Admin/Founder
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2003
    7,093
    2,107
    1,174
    Location:
    Charlotte, NC
    Vehicle:
    2013 Prius Plug-in
    Model:
    Plug-in Base
    That I agree with :)
     
  17. Frank Hudon

    Frank Hudon Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2004
    4,147
    18
    0
    Rick the battery got hit right between the red and green arrows on the RH side top of the battery. It has pushed the top towards the front of the car. There is about 1/2-3/4" clearance inside of the cover till it contacts the termina strip. The top of the cover is pushed down and the whole cover is tilted forward and the battery module is moved in about 1 inch toward the front of the car. I'm not sure if it was the cover or the tray underneat it that the front of the plate hooks into that caused the damage but it got hit. I'd love to tell you that we get a new car but the insurance company is repairing the car, we have replacement cost insurnace which provides replacement at 75% of the value of the car. So far were just over 50% so they are repairing it. Now they are violating their contract by not replacing the battery as all parts damaged are to be replace with that insurance and the battery is damaged. Would I buy a Prius, for sure and I did last week, but I bought what was probably the last new 2K3 Prius in Canada. Got a great deal on it and drove it home, 1,782 Kilometers for an average 4.3L per 100 Km's. That included 5 mountain passes and 70 Km an hour head winds for 300K and -2C and some snow and slush. The Classic is a great car (our second one) and very reliable and gets good mileage.
     
  18. Frank Hudon

    Frank Hudon Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2004
    4,147
    18
    0
    Further to my origional post about not buying a 2K4 is I'd seriously think about it till this problem is addressed. I've looked at the car every Friday morning since the accident and have been thinking about what Toyota has to do to ensure everybodys safety. The thoughts I have about the trunk plate (floor plate)what ever we want to call it is to make it
    1) three inches shorter and make plates to connect to the seat backs that pull forward as the seats are folded down. This would provide a continuous floor. They would need to reinforce the front of the plate (load support) and provide locks to stop the plate from going forward.
    2) make the floor plate so it slides in sections, so instead of lifting it up you would slide it forward to expose the tub below.
    I've given this issue a lot of thought, 40 years as a mechanic, with lots of fabrication and welding thrown in the mix, has let me look at design problems and try to work a solution that improves the product. This whole accident issue and the lack of support from Toyota to provide the insurance adjuster with some proper guidance has left me less than impressed. To put it mildly. As for parts, most were in stock in Toronto Ontario, and a few had to come from Japan. Most are very expensive, the battery backup module for the brakes is over $1500 Cdn. the antenna for the smart key on the back is over $425, the body man said with a laugh that the box the hood came in weighed more than the hood. I'll probably make another post on the support for the inverter under the hood and how it shouldn't be connected to the upper rad support and conneted to the frame horn, but that will be later.
     
  19. norman

    norman New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2004
    77
    0
    0
    Location:
    Australia
    Frank,

    are you saying that there is an exposed (bare metal) battery terminal strip that sits just 3/4" under the metal battery cover, and that this strip bares 200+ volts !!

    Isn't there any way that you can publish a picture, or a diagram?
     
  20. Frank Hudon

    Frank Hudon Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2004
    4,147
    18
    0
    no the termial strip is a plastic composit strip along the battery modules. It doesn't expost the connection to the battery modules but covers the connections.