1. Attachments are working again! Check out this thread for more details and to report any other bugs.

Inventor of the turbojet engine

Discussion in 'Fred's House of Pancakes' started by Ronald Doles, May 25, 2021.

  1. Ronald Doles

    Ronald Doles Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2019
    230
    280
    0
    Location:
    Columbus, OH
    Vehicle:
    2015 Prius v wagon
    Model:
    Two
    I just watched a documentary on Frank Whittle, the British inventor of the turbojet engine. He joined the RAF and was assigned to a fighter squadron in 1928. He was enrolled in an officer training course at Cranwell. While attending Cranwell, he did his thesis on future aircraft technology and realized that planes of the future had to fly much higher and faster than piston engines would allow. He realized that the engine was the major stumbling block to future aircraft design and began thinking about a completely different kind of engine. He applied for and got a patent for his engine design in 1930.

    He and two retired RAF servicemen created PowerJets LTD. They built several prototypes based on his turbojet engine design on a shoestring budget. The first few iterations ran away and exploded before he finally got the controls figured out. They had a working engine in 1937. they presented it to the British government but there was skepticism that it was practical. Had they pursued it, the Battle of Britain might have been fought with British jet fighter aircraft against the Luftwaffe.

    The government finally acknowledged his design concept and then covered it with the official secrets act which made getting funding more difficult because he couldn't tell potential investors what he was working on. Although the British government covered his design with the official secrets act, they allowed the patent to remain public. Germany based their jet engine fighter technology on his patent drawings.

    The British government then gave an order to start manufacturing the engine to Rover who knew nothing about jet engine materials or manufacturing. Manufacturing problems at Rover delayed it 2 years. They finally moved production to Rolls Royce who realized that it was the future of aircraft powerplants and made a viable product out of it.

    The German government proved to be just as inept as the Brits. Heinkel already had a working jet airplane based on his design but top German military leaders favored the Messerschmitt company over Heinkel and authorized them to build the jet despite Heinkel's technological lead. That authorization caused a delay of 2 years in their jet fighter development. It seemed like it was sort of a race to see who could delay jet aircraft development the longest.

    The first prototype ME262 flew in 1941 but it didn't fly in numbers until 1944. It took RAF encounters with the German ME262 before they realized the performance advantage that the jet engine gave the German aircraft. The first British fighter jet prototype, the Glouster Meteor flew in 1943 and the first Glouster squadron was created in late 1944.

    Once jet aircraft became a reality, Whittle thought about the fact that the jet was not as fuel efficient as a piston engine and suggested bypassing some of the compressor gasses creating what is today called the turbofan. It dramatically reduced the noise and increased the fuel efficiency of the engines and is used in most commercial aircraft today.

    Frank Whittle was the Edison of jet aircraft engine design.
     
  2. GabrielD

    GabrielD Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2019
    179
    71
    0
    Location:
    Romania
    Vehicle:
    2014 Prius+ MPV
    Model:
    V
    According to "cs.stanford.edu/" inventor of jet engine was Hans von Ohain...
    Here you can read furthermore...
     
  3. ETC(SS)

    ETC(SS) The OTHER One Percenter.....

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2010
    7,673
    6,492
    0
    Location:
    Redneck Riviera (Gulf South)
    Vehicle:
    Other Non-Hybrid
    Model:
    N/A
    True, but there's inventing, and then there's INVENTING.
    Bell, Wright, Ford, Edison.....ALL of these didn't "invent" their groundbreaking products but they made practical examples and took them out of the lab and into the real world.

    @ Battle of Britan.
    Radar and ground control won that fight.

    People who look at cue cards and read cliff notes will sometimes opine that the Supermarine Spitfire "won the battel" without knowing or understanding that the Hawker Hurricane actually formed the backbone of the RAF (and American Eagle) squadrons when....."England Stood Alone."
    ....But the Supermarine product looked 'prettier' on the news-reels of the day.

    They still do it today.
    Ask any armature historian about which plane knocked out more tanks in Gulf 1.0 and they will invariable (and mistakenly) point to the A-10.

    When Dubbaya-Dubbaya Too broke out they were still working the bugs out of the Supermarine product, which suffered from some well-known engine problems, and the Gloster Meteor was still years away from serial production BECAUSE it was ground-breaking tech.
    Had they sucked time and resources to try to bring the Meteor on-line then we would have had to fight the Nazis from a lot closer to home.

    They still would have lost....but it would have been a lot longer fight.

    Because we (pretended) to stay out of the war until almost 1942, we often forget that the UK was in a 100-percent, all hands on deck transformation into a wartime production economy in the late 30s while we were still making refrigerators and cars.
    In the UK, furniture companies were making the airframes for the iconic de Havilland DH.98 Mosquito....."Bomber Harris" was sucking up resources for his Lancasters and Wimpys....and they still had to make all of the other stuff.....beans, bullets, gas, guns, tanks, ships, and subs.
     
    PhilWray2 likes this.