1. Attachments are working again! Check out this thread for more details and to report any other bugs.

Prius may not save as much as you think...

Discussion in 'Gen 3 Prius Main Forum' started by AllenZ, Jan 13, 2013.

  1. JimboPalmer

    JimboPalmer Tsar of all the Rushers

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2009
    12,470
    6,862
    2
    Location:
    Greenwood MS USA
    Vehicle:
    2012 Prius v wagon
    Model:
    Three
    Are we still at the point where if I keep my car 1/3 the length of time I historically have and drive 1/2 as much as I do I 'only' save $6000?

    Oh and if I point that out, I am just a fanboi. I see.
     
  2. Randy G.

    Randy G. Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2006
    113
    28
    0
    Location:
    Fullerton, CA
    Vehicle:
    2012 Prius
    Model:
    Five
    I have a 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee SRT8 I drive for towing and fun. It gets gallons per mile not miles per gallon. With the amount of driving I do I was putting $110+ a week worth of premium gas in it the first few weeks of ownership.

    Not wanting to wear out the JGC by piling the miles on it we bought a 2012 Prius. The savings we're getting on gas and wear and tear on the JGC is huge. Admittedly, I'm still a little upside down owning two vehicles, but all I can say is I'm not funding Al Jazeer's oil funded purchase of Al Gore's TV station at the pump any more. Where I used to trim the trips because of fuel costs my wife and I can now enjoy trips in the Prius without getting gouged. I needed a vehicle for occasional towing and got the JGC SRT8, but the Prius has become our "preferred" choice when going somewhere.

    I have some friends who are suprised by us getting the Prius. We are luxury and sports car type people. I guess I don't understand why people don't think the Prius is a nice car. We got a level 5 and love it. Yea, the doors are a little thin, etc. But so are some people's skin. Other than that, it has all the options we want in a car. If I was looking to buy any car available for $30K+/- I wouldn't expect anything nicer than the Prius we got. The bonus (reason for doing it) was 50+ miles per gallon.
     
    cwerdna and OceanEyes like this.
  3. AllenZ

    AllenZ Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2010
    640
    63
    0
    Location:
    Chicago
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    Four
    My original post was to point out that fuel cost is a small part of TOC. There are fixed cost associated with car ownership that's similar for any cars.

    I know the biggest savings we can get is to avoid the hefty depreciation, even though Prius tends to depreciate slower than other cars. That's why I bought my 2004 used, 3 years ago in cash for merely $8000 with 110K.

    My operating cost is at $12/100 miles. $8 goes to fuel, $3 to depreciation, and $1 for maintenance. I've budgeted $2000 for HV battery replacement in future, which will add $2 onto maintenance for next 100K miles, make the operating cost $14/100 miles in long run.
     
  4. ItsNotAboutTheMoney

    ItsNotAboutTheMoney EditProfOptInfoCustomUser Title

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2009
    2,287
    460
    0
    Location:
    Maine
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    II
    How is it a surprise? 25 mpg to 50 mpg for 15,000 miles is a difference of 300 gallons.

    Also no suprise is that somebody looking at a new car in the low $30ks thinks that $1,200 is insignificant.

    Now try extending it to the life of the car and compare.
     
  5. AllenZ

    AllenZ Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2010
    640
    63
    0
    Location:
    Chicago
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    Four
    It's the difference between 15% and 50% savings. That was a surprise for me at least.
     
  6. fuzzy1

    fuzzy1 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2009
    17,285
    10,140
    90
    Location:
    Western Washington
    Vehicle:
    Other Hybrid
    Model:
    N/A
    That is because it counted TOC over only 75k miles. What about the next 150k miles?

    For the distance my household has driven its nonhybrid cars, the fuel costs have exceeded the original purchase prices of the cars.
     
    OceanEyes and dbcassidy like this.
  7. bwilson4web

    bwilson4web BMW i3 and Model 3

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2005
    27,362
    15,507
    0
    Location:
    Huntsville AL
    Vehicle:
    2018 Tesla Model 3
    Model:
    Prime Plus
    There are three economic models at play:
    • new car under warranty - presumes minor and major repairs are covered (KBB model)
    • used car under partial warranty - presumes drive train repairs are covered, past initial depreciation (KBB without first three years)
    • used car no warranty - total owner responsibility, fully depreciated (post KBB)
    A 2004 model Prius is not likely to see much depreciation over the next years. As for major repairs, other than the MFD and a few recalls, the probability of a major failure remains lower than an accident. So what should be the next replacement car?
    • late model NHW20 - similar to 2004 Prius but a lot of early defects corrected. A 2009 model should be a very solid car with a low risk of ownership.
    • early model ZVW30 - just coming off the first warranty, superior drive train but early defects are likely to have been warranty addressed in the field, not factory. Too soon to know if there are any life-time wear issues that might extend beyond the long-term warranty. There remains some buzz about braking but it remains intermittent and indistinct. Also, the cooled exhaust and exhaust heat recovery are new technologies and we don't yet know their long-term reliability.
    If the 1.5L, NHW20 fully meets the owner's expectations, there is no need to change. However, the used 1.8L ZVW30 has more space and power and provides a number of important mileage improvements and new technologies. Only the most recent, 1.8L ZVW30 has the option of incorporating newer, revised manufacturing improvements but the initial depreciation is a killer. It remains a complex problem with no easy solution.

    Bob Wilson
     
    cwerdna and AllenZ like this.
  8. AllenZ

    AllenZ Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2010
    640
    63
    0
    Location:
    Chicago
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    Four
    Agree!
    That's why I bought my 2004 at 110K 3 years ago, when my new job requires me to drive 130 miles/day. I saved about $8 per working day on gas only.
     
  9. mjones12

    mjones12 Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2012
    115
    26
    0
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Vehicle:
    2012 Prius
    Model:
    Four
    I think, for the most part, you are right. And, as with Ed Burke's latest post, they will invite you to get lost if your opinion varies from theirs.
     
  10. bwilson4web

    bwilson4web BMW i3 and Model 3

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2005
    27,362
    15,507
    0
    Location:
    Huntsville AL
    Vehicle:
    2018 Tesla Model 3
    Model:
    Prime Plus
    I forgot to mention something that Consumer Reports once said and I agree,'the last model year of car is usually the best.' What happens is all of the known improvements show up in the last year:
    • 2003 - NHW11 (good enough but over 10 years old, please avoid)
    • 2009 - NHW20 (excellent and only 4-5 years old)
    Almost any model year of the NHW20 is a better buy than the NHW11 because so many technical improvements were made. But if you're going after an NHW20, try to find a 2009 for a good price, first.

    GOOD LUCK!
    Bob Wilson
     
  11. John H

    John H Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2012
    2,208
    558
    0
    Vehicle:
    2007 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    So assembling your anaylsis, a 3+ year old 2009 model with less than 100,000 miles would be the sweet spot ?
     
    bwilson4web likes this.
  12. Me Here

    Me Here Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2012
    149
    26
    0
    Vehicle:
    2012 Prius
    Model:
    Three
    When I compared what I'd spend on everything EXCLUDING depreciation, because really...a car is only worth what someone will pay for it, I came up with about $16k spent to own it for 5 years. Gas was one thing I would spend more on each year because I drive more often. Insurance and maintenance is much less for me than the "project" numbers, mainly because I have a maintenance package and up until about year 4 I will be covered and insurance is a mere $1.1k each year, soon to go down when my better half reaches the ripe ol age of of...27? I think that is when you are meant to get an insurance break.
    Honestly, how do they come up with these projected numbers anyway?
     
  13. AllenZ

    AllenZ Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2010
    640
    63
    0
    Location:
    Chicago
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    Four
    Bob,
    What's the major difference between 2006 and 2009? My impression is very little difference. Please advise.

    Allen
     
  14. AllenZ

    AllenZ Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2010
    640
    63
    0
    Location:
    Chicago
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    Four
    I am trying to coach my daughter, how to think rationally and not to be the slave of her own emotion. I admit that I am having a hard time, but she is only 16.

    As someone said, being rational is great, but go with emotion has so much fun!
     
  15. Tandem Rider

    Tandem Rider Junior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2012
    56
    7
    0
    Location:
    Indianapolis, Indiana
    Vehicle:
    2016 Prius
    Model:
    Three
    Read the Consumer Reports lastest edition (Feb. 2013). It makes me feel good about my Prius purchase last year.
     
  16. usbseawolf2000

    usbseawolf2000 HSD PhD

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2004
    14,487
    2,996
    0
    Location:
    Fort Lee, NJ
    Vehicle:
    2012 Prius Plug-in
    Model:
    Plug-in Base
    Way to make a point. You used a fully loaded Prius FIVE, so the depreciation would be at highest. And then compare it to a stripped down lowest MSRP gas-only car? Point taken.

    You just showed that the loaded options won't pay for itself and you'll take a lot in depreciation hit (and tax) to own those features.

    The only feature that doesn't depreciate is the hybrid fuel saving feature.
     
  17. AllenZ

    AllenZ Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2010
    640
    63
    0
    Location:
    Chicago
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    Four
    If you run the calculator for a base Prius, I think the result will be similar, and the point will still be valid, that is: Fuel cost is the smaller part of TOC. Hence fuel saving of 50% in Prius should not be confused with TOC saving. And so a used Gen II will greatly reduce your TOC by cutting depreciation, and other cost associated with new car.
    In my view, other than fuel saving, Gen II Prius is extremely low cost on maintenance, and super reliable, even beats Camry.
     
  18. Me Here

    Me Here Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2012
    149
    26
    0
    Vehicle:
    2012 Prius
    Model:
    Three
    Have you driven the new camry? I had one as a rental for a month and it was up there on my top 5 list of worst cars I've had to drive. I drove long distance and it was uncomfortable, would blow all over the road, and even with the "eco" feature still only got on average 28 mpg, which is what my scion would get.
     
  19. telmo744

    telmo744 HSD fanatic

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2010
    2,178
    768
    0
    Location:
    Portugal
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    How about the future value "hold" of Prius?
    I've seen high prices for 1Gen Prii for sale (are they a classic already?) in www.mobile.de...
    And for sure, since they are (from 2Gen onwards) able of being "upgraded" to plug-in or LPG converted (all series), and nevertheless very low on maintenance and fuel costs, perhaps we are talking about high resale values...
    TOC includes resale...
     
  20. iClaudius

    iClaudius Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2012
    435
    135
    0
    Location:
    Kansas
    Vehicle:
    2012 Prius
    Model:
    Three
    Mine saves as much as I thought, 50% less oil (no need to fight oil wars on my account) and 50% less pollution (we can meet the 80% reduction by 2050 if we commit the resources).