1. Attachments are working again! Check out this thread for more details and to report any other bugs.

Renewable resources more popular than US government predicts

Discussion in 'Environmental Discussion' started by pilotgrrl, Oct 20, 2017.

  1. pilotgrrl

    pilotgrrl Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2017
    891
    1,796
    0
    Location:
    Chicagoan in TX
    Vehicle:
    2016 Prius
    Model:
    Three
  2. bisco

    bisco cookie crumbler

    Joined:
    May 11, 2005
    107,686
    48,936
    0
    Location:
    boston
    Vehicle:
    2012 Prius Plug-in
    Model:
    Plug-in Base
    nice, let's hope it doesn't stagnate.
     
    pilotgrrl likes this.
  3. tochatihu

    tochatihu Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2004
    8,995
    3,507
    0
    Location:
    Kunming Yunnan China
    Vehicle:
    2001 Prius
  4. bwilson4web

    bwilson4web BMW i3 and Model 3

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2005
    27,121
    15,387
    0
    Location:
    Huntsville AL
    Vehicle:
    2018 Tesla Model 3
    Model:
    Prime Plus
    It is browser/firewall issue as it appears to be an interactive map:
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    Bob Wilson
     
    tochatihu likes this.
  5. austingreen

    austingreen Senior Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2009
    13,531
    4,062
    0
    Location:
    Austin, TX, USA
    Vehicle:
    2018 Tesla Model 3
    Model:
    N/A
    If you look at the texas experience - the state has built more wind than any other states wind and solar combined. The growth has been fueled by regulatory rules. Texas does have incentives, but they are smaller than many states. Key regulatory changes allowed customers to choose wind or solar, and lock in a price. This was higher than current electricity prices, but certainty and choice made it work. The state also separated the expensive grid expansion and smart grid that allowed for renewables to be charged to the bulk of utility customers, not just the renewable customers. ERCOT is rather unique in that it was designed to be totally within a state, and thus not subject to federal politics. Renewables in the other grids often must wait for federal decissions, slowing adoption. They are often mismanaged by other states, making adoption much more expensive.

    On the other hand incentives especially the feed through tarrif has propelled the germany to expand renewables to a level higher than other countries. German electricity is much more expensive though, and there are trade offs.

    Access to good wind or solar also makes it an uneven proposition, but much of the US could build much faster with promotion of grid improvements, cycling resources (areas that use mainly nuclear and thermal fossil have a hard time adding renewables), and choice. Financial incentives for solar and wind are probably high enough right now, but the structure is probably wrong. Feed in tarrifs and low interest loans would probably be better than the rebates for solar.