1. Attachments are working again! Check out this thread for more details and to report any other bugs.

Response to "Godless"

Discussion in 'Fred's House of Pancakes' started by Mirza, Jun 11, 2006.

?
  1. Yes

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  2. No

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  3. Other (Please detail this response)

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  1. dbermanmd

    dbermanmd New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2005
    8,553
    18
    0
    Location:
    manhattan
    Vehicle:
    2006 Prius
    You might want to start with an easier topic like correcting all the untruths in michale moore's F9/11.
     
  2. larkinmj

    larkinmj New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2006
    1,996
    5
    0
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(dbermanmd @ Jun 12 2006, 10:35 AM) [snapback]269901[/snapback]</div>
    Have you seen the film?
     
  3. Mystery Squid

    Mystery Squid Junior Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2005
    2
    3
    0
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(dbermanmd @ Jun 12 2006, 10:35 AM) [snapback]269901[/snapback]</div>
    ...and the highly unobjective spin. Just like all his other documentaries, you see everything through HIS glasses, PARTICULARLY F9/11... Everytime I see him, I wonder what it would be like to kick his gut. The fat rippling up through his neck would make a great repeating-loop avatar... :D
     
  4. Wildkow

    Wildkow New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2006
    5,270
    37
    36
    Vehicle:
    2006 Prius
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(fshagan @ Jun 11 2006, 05:03 PM) [snapback]269715[/snapback]</div>
    Nope wrong on both accounts he meant "Persecuted" :lol: , BaHaHaHahAHAHAaaa I kill myself. :blink:
     
  5. tbstout2

    tbstout2 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2005
    156
    0
    3
    Location:
    Hallieford, VA
    Vehicle:
    2011 Prius
    Model:
    III
    Ann is a damn hack! She makes stuff up just to put it in print. If you read her “footnotes†(she calls them that, but they are actually in the back of the book – and therefore not footnotes!) you can usually find an inconsistency or a comment that dilutes the “messageâ€. I haven’t looked at this book to see if she still uses the footnote rationalization, but I’m guessing that once a hack always a hack.

    Her crap is like Michael Moore’s (though I love how he made “W†look!) and Rush Limbaugh’s – too far to either side to take seriously.