1. Attachments are working again! Check out this thread for more details and to report any other bugs.

Satellite calibration is not trivial

Discussion in 'Environmental Discussion' started by bwilson4web, Mar 29, 2015.

  1. bwilson4web

    bwilson4web BMW i3 and Model 3

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2005
    27,066
    15,372
    0
    Location:
    Huntsville AL
    Vehicle:
    2017 Prius Prime
    Model:
    Prime Plus
    Source: New research brings satellite measurements and global climate models closer | UW Today

    To hang a record on one instrument, NOAA-9, is always risky. But there is another factor, the daily temperature change (i.e., "diurnal drift corrections".) This is an area cited in this abstract:
    Source: An Error Occurred Setting Your User Cookie, March 2015.

    It makes sense that ocean waters would have well defined, predictable diurnal effects. But land would be the challenge if nothing else because of:
    • water content
    • material
    • angle
    • biological cover
    This sounds very interesting, a technical challenge to puzzle out. Interesting because this is also a meteorology effect. Climate and weather touching the same phenomena.

    Bob Wilson

    ps. Found this interesting read: http://www.atmos.uw.edu/~qfu/Publications/jtech.pochedley.2015.pdf
     
    #1 bwilson4web, Mar 29, 2015
    Last edited: Mar 29, 2015
  2. tochatihu

    tochatihu Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2004
    8,972
    3,501
    0
    Location:
    Kunming Yunnan China
    Vehicle:
    2001 Prius
    Estimating temperature of a layer of the atmosphere, while looking down through all the layers above, based on microwave 'brightness', has always been a challenge.

    It does offer some potential advantages to surface thermometers, so it's a good thing that several groups make the effort. Coverage is truly global (except at high latitudes the 'looking down' angle is steep because the birds don't go there). The initial data is archived (somewhere) so that when the retrieval algorithms are improved, the entire time series can be redone.

    The record shows much stronger response to ENSO than surface thermometers, this is unexplained and limits its value as a time series. Also, it refers to a place where average T is about -25 and oxygen is scarce. In no way is it a record of T 'where you live'.