Shopping and torn.. Loaded 2009 or less loaded 2010?

Are they both under 36,000 miles? Because its my understanding you cannot buy Toyotas extended warranty unless its still under the 3/36k warranty.

 

Ok.

So this definitely applies to me because I just went through the same thing (well almost). I found a 2008 base model that I really liked. 55k miles (out of the bumper to bumper but still under the remaining 5/60k powertrain warranty). I almost bought it until....

I found a 2007 Level 5 (nav, JBL, smart key, new tires with extra set of winter tires/rims) with 53k miles.

I went for the loaded, 1 year older one. In my case I am unable to obtain the Toyota extended warranty but I still have the remaining 10/100k hybrid component warranty. After I drove the Level 5 I couldnt go back to the 1 year newer Level 2. Im LOVING the bluetooth and extra fun stuffs that come with the Level 5 - ultimately it increases my driving enjoyment and satisfies my adult ADD (gadgets!)....lol....YMMV

 

I voted for the 09. It's a tough call as the Gen 3 is a superior car and I like its looks better as well.

However, since it sounds like reliability is of concern, perhaps the 09 being the last model of a Gen 2 (so most bugs were worked out) vs. '10 being 1st year of a new generation might make the 09 a better choice. And you're getting more gadgets w/the 09 referenced.

 

i was in the same position-- kindof

2006 Prius 5 vs 2010 Prius 2

I went with the 2010 because i really like the redesign, the gas milage is higher, i should get more out of it if i need to resell it and i can always add the gadgets later... you can add gadgets, but you cant subtract years.

 

If you intend to keep the car forever then 1 year isn't going to make a difference. The 2010 is a bit more efficient & should need less maintenance. IMO no problems with either Model Year. Many "Touring" cars are misrepresented. Make sure it is a Touring before paying for a Touring. If you are going to be happier with a carload of gizmos then the loaded 2009 sounds like a better fit.

 

I have a 2004 and we have a 2001, a 2010, and soon a 2012 Plugin. My car came with GPS, nav, Bluetooth etc. But I installed upgraded audio which is magnitudes better than the even the JBL package in my dads 2010. The gadgets in the gen 2 are starting to show their age. 2010 would be my choice

Nexus 7 ? 2

 

Yep. Gen 3 has no belts, so that's one less item. Also Gen 3 has 10K mile oil change intervals but IIRC, requires synthetic oil. Gen 2 has 5K mile OCI.

​

This! It's very annoying.

If the car has 15" wheels and tires, then it's not a Touring. Tourings came w/16". It's pretty unlikely a Touring owner decided to ditch their 16"s and swap for 15".

 

definately a personal choice, both great cars. take 'em for a spin and make your decision based on your preference. all the best!

 

If its not asking too much, how much are the two cars? If the newer one is the same price as the loaded one or the older one is priced to sell for a song and a dance, well this all makes a difference.

 

We definitely need more details to give you an advice.

 

I happen to like the interior of the gen 2 more and I went with a later year gen 2 for that reason and because there should be less problems that have yet to be worked out vs a first year gen 3 which was a redesign. I'd go for the loaded gen 2. I did like some aspects of the gen 3 redesign however. New battery and no belts. Either way you'll be happy I'm sure.

 

I agree the gen 2 interior is better, much more simple and less cluttered IMHO. But the gen 3 is a better car, better mpgs, more comfortable seats, more powerful

Nexus 7 ? 2