1. Attachments are working again! Check out this thread for more details and to report any other bugs.

Should Medical Providers be allowed to refuse treatment?

Discussion in 'Fred's House of Pancakes' started by Wildkow, Aug 4, 2007.

?
  1. Yes

    17.4%
  2. No

    65.2%
  3. Ethical only

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  4. Religious only.

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  5. Requires BOTH ethical and religious.

    8.7%
  6. I don't know.

    8.7%
  1. Wildkow

    Wildkow New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2006
    5,270
    37
    36
    Vehicle:
    2006 Prius
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Godiva @ Aug 4 2007, 10:06 PM) [snapback]490773[/snapback]</div>
    Considering your reply to the LA Times reporter trying to contact me.
    I'd say a proctologist would be the ideal person to perform a cranial extraction. :lol: :p [attachmentid=10386]

    Wildkow
     

    Attached Files:

  2. Wildkow

    Wildkow New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2006
    5,270
    37
    36
    Vehicle:
    2006 Prius
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(MarinJohn @ Aug 5 2007, 09:10 AM) [snapback]490874[/snapback]</div>
    Good grief! MJ you're using a life/death situation to compare the two? No wonder we butt heads so often. <_<

    Wildkow
     
  3. Godiva

    Godiva AmeriKan Citizen

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2005
    10,339
    14
    0
    Location:
    San Diego, CA
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Wildkow @ Aug 5 2007, 12:17 PM) [snapback]490901[/snapback]</div>

    I'll save this as an example of a personal attack.
     
  4. Godiva

    Godiva AmeriKan Citizen

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2005
    10,339
    14
    0
    Location:
    San Diego, CA
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(efusco @ Aug 5 2007, 09:32 AM) [snapback]490853[/snapback]</div>
    Of course, I don't want a physician without any ethics or morals. But a Physician that chooses that field better be prepared for some compromise.

    I don't want to go to an emergency room and bleed to death because a physician won't work on the Sabbath and he refuses to touch me until it's the "next day". Should a Christian Scientist be allowed to be a doctor and then refuse to prescribe any medication because it's against his religion?

    Do all of the hospitals and emergency rooms in Israel shut down from sundown Friday until sundown on Saturday?

    Do the hospitals in Muslim countries import doctors so their women can get medical treatment?

    And there are doctors that perform illegal acts on ethical and moral grounds. I'm talking about mercy-killing here. Doctors that overprescribe morphine to a terminally ill cancer patient to end suffering. Don't tell me it doesn't happen.

    If a Doctor can commit an illegal act on ethical and moral grounds, they should be able to commit a legal act, even if it violates their personal ethics and morals. Like prescribe the morning after pill in a timely manner so that it is actually effective. That's a time-sensitive prescription. If I've been raped I want it NOW. I don't want to have to be referred from office to office trying to get a prescription.
     
  5. Wildkow

    Wildkow New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2006
    5,270
    37
    36
    Vehicle:
    2006 Prius
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Godiva @ Aug 5 2007, 10:55 AM) [snapback]490911[/snapback]</div>
    Don't forget the smilies at the end of the sentence! :D :p :rolleyes:

    Wildkow

    p.s. besides in the sage words of efusco would you respect me if I let that one go by?

    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Godiva @ Aug 5 2007, 11:06 AM) [snapback]490917[/snapback]</div>
    How about a doctor that refuses to perform an abortion because neither the mother or the baby's health is in jeopardy?

    Wildkow
     
  6. burritos

    burritos Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2006
    4,946
    252
    0
    Location:
    California
    Vehicle:
    2006 Prius
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Wildkow @ Aug 5 2007, 01:14 PM) [snapback]490919[/snapback]</div>
    Why would a patient who wanted an abortion go to a physician who didn't perform them? That makes no sense.
     
  7. IsrAmeriPrius

    IsrAmeriPrius Progressive Member

    Joined:
    May 27, 2004
    4,333
    7
    0
    Location:
    Southern California
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Godiva @ Aug 5 2007, 11:06 AM) [snapback]490917[/snapback]</div>
    In Jewish law, the concept of Pikuah Nefesh (the savings or preservation of human life) takes precedence over all other commandments in the Torah. Thus, doctors and others are obligated to save lives even if the Sabbath may be desecrated. As a matter of fact, it sinful to wait until the conclusion of the Sabbath or the Festivals to drive the sick or injured to a hospital for medical treatment. According to the Shulhan Arukh, "One who is zealous (and eagerly violates the Sabbath in such a case) is praiseworthy."
     
  8. efusco

    efusco Moderator Emeritus
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2003
    19,891
    1,192
    9
    Location:
    Nixa, MO
    Vehicle:
    2004 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Godiva @ Aug 5 2007, 01:06 PM) [snapback]490917[/snapback]</div>
    Trust me, we all have made some compromises. But there are lines we won't cross. You seem to want it all...values and ethics and morals...but only to the point that you find convenient. We're individuals, our values vary and you seem to want to take away our right to select that line or our right to be physicians.

    I have been careful, in almost every post I've made (3 times now, this being the 4th I believe) to make it clear that in an emergency our priority is the life of the patient. Have you missed all the times I said that or are you selectively choosing to ignore that? Physicians who can't work on the Sabbath usually have arrangements with their partners so that they don't get scheduled on those days.

    If the Christan Scientist can complete all the requirements of medical school and residence then they can be a doctor, but their specialty and practice will be limited by what they are able and willing to do.

    I don't know, but I don't think so. I'm not an expert on Judaism and their rules, but I'm pretty sure they make exceptions to the 'work rules' in the case or critical jobs. Again, the example question was about Viagra...something NEVER necessary by most people's definition of an emergency. You've argued, before this thread, that physicians should be compelled and willing to prescribe even non-emergent or even critical to basic heath medications (like Viagra) against their morals and values. Now in this thread you're finding extreme cases of life and death to try to bolster your arguement. Meanwhile, in my very first post to this thead I specifically addressed the issue of emergencies and life/death treatment being the exception where a physician is compelled to treat.

    No, they hire Muslim Women...or did you forget about the fact that women can be physicians?

    Uh, yea. Irrelevant to the current discussion. Start a new thread if you'd like to cover that. We're discussing physicians who are not willing to violate their own values in this thread.

    I'm going to strongly recommend you consider a college level course on logic. This is a fine example of circular logic. You're using one example unrelated to another and trying to connect them. Committing a crime, no matter the reason, is a crime. We are not talking about a crime...except that now you want to make it a crime for a physican to act on his values. Crazy.

    I covered this...are you paying attention at all? Truely, this is frustrating b/c you seem to have abandoned all efforts at logic and reason in this thread and you seem to be ignoring previously made points as well.

    I'm honestly very happy to discuss this topic, but it's highly frustrating to have you ignore previously addressed points and fail to acknowledge key points such as autonomy and freedoms of the physician. We are not automatons of a dictatorial government, we practice medicine for the good of people, and to some extent that means doing what we feel is best even if it isn't exactly what a patient wants.
     
  9. galaxee

    galaxee mostly benevolent

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2005
    9,810
    465
    0
    Location:
    MD
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(efusco @ Aug 4 2007, 11:25 PM) [snapback]490745[/snapback]</div>
    very well written. i reconsider my original position. we all have to make compromises i think, and so long as a physician is willing to consider the interest of the patient first in an emergency/time critical situation (rather than trying to spread their personal ideals, for example) i see no harm done.
     
  10. Spoid

    Spoid New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2006
    286
    0
    0
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(MarinJohn @ Aug 5 2007, 09:10 AM) [snapback]490874[/snapback]</div>

    I don't think anybody here is saying it is OK to withhold emergency care because of personal beliefs. We're just talking a normal business day. In which case I believe a doctor should be able to run his practice the way he wants.
     
  11. Wildkow

    Wildkow New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2006
    5,270
    37
    36
    Vehicle:
    2006 Prius
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(IsrAmeriPrius @ Aug 5 2007, 01:46 PM) [snapback]490957[/snapback]</div>
    This is the same as Jesus taught. The Sabbath was made for man not man for the Sabbath. People that try to pin authoritarian Sabbath keeping as put forth by the Sadducees and Pharisees of Jesus time on Jews or Christian Sabbath keepers sorely misunderstand what the Bible teaches. It's time to pick one up for your self and not rely upon someone else's interpretation or explanation.

    Wildkow

    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(efusco @ Aug 5 2007, 02:36 PM) [snapback]490976[/snapback]</div>
    You're losing doc. I guess, on this board at least, only 95% of the pregnant women that don't want the inconvenience of motherhood get freedom of choice.

    Wildkow
     
  12. pogo

    pogo New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2006
    154
    0
    0
    I guess I believe that anyone should follow their conscience, and suffer the results. It's only when people want to have their ethics ensconced as law in order to avoid any negative consequences that I have a problem. If you're not willing to accept that your choice may have negative consequences, then shut up and go back to work.
     
  13. Wildkow

    Wildkow New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2006
    5,270
    37
    36
    Vehicle:
    2006 Prius
  14. Dave_PH

    Dave_PH New Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2008
    2,416
    78
    0
    Location:
    Florida &amp; DC
    Vehicle:
    Other Non-Hybrid
    They were refusing to give it to Catholic priests.
     
  15. Wildkow

    Wildkow New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2006
    5,270
    37
    36
    Vehicle:
    2006 Prius
    lol!
    :pound:​
     
  16. efusco

    efusco Moderator Emeritus
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2003
    19,891
    1,192
    9
    Location:
    Nixa, MO
    Vehicle:
    2004 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    I think the way around this, for those who do object morally, will be to say that they don't feel the risk of giving the medication justifies the medical benefit. Thus couching it in terms of the health of the patient.

    I have mixed feelings on a law like this. I shouldn't be mandated to prescribe medication or treatment I feel is morally wrong...but, that said, I don't think we need to empower providers to allow their morals to overwhelm those of their patients.
     
  17. DaveinOlyWA

    DaveinOlyWA 3rd Time was Solariffic!!

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2004
    15,140
    611
    0
    Location:
    South Puget Sound, WA
    Vehicle:
    2013 Nissan LEAF
    Model:
    Persona
    AMA is always available. but if people want something, especially if its "elective" and not intrinsically harmful to them, give it to them.

    i dont think anyone has the right to implore their religious, moral or anything else for that matter opinion on some one else.

    on the question of contraception, there should not be a question at all. the sheer number of unwanted children in this world is blatant shame upon Mankind that is unconscious-able.

    if someone for any reason, does not want the child, so be it. the option of having a child grow up in a potentially unwanted situation is far greater than any "moral" crime.

    to be honest with ya, religion imm, is to blame for nearly every problem we face today

    **edit**
    on the question of medical practices in Israel, i have been lucky enough to have traveled many "religious" countries and i think you will find that rules like "not working" on any specific days are lucky to be followed by a very small segment of any society.

    i work with some people of various religious backgrounds, and i can honestly say that a lot of the fanatical religious rules are pretty much fading away
     
  18. boulder_bum

    boulder_bum Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2007
    1,371
    38
    0
    Location:
    Castle Rock, CO
    Vehicle:
    2007 Prius
    Relevant Questions:

    An unemployed welfare mom with 6 kids comes wanting embryos implanted. Do you help her?
    A teenage mother comes wanting to kill her fetus without her parents knowing? What about her?
    A man with a serious heart condition comes wanting Viagra, which raises blood pressure. Do you give it to him? (My wife is a nurse practitioner, and she had that situation once)
     
  19. patsparks

    patsparks An Aussie perspective

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2007
    10,664
    567
    0
    Location:
    Adelaide South Australia
    Vehicle:
    2004 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    Funny as a fart in a jar when you go to a country where drinking alcohol is not allowed due to religious grounds but is sold at exorbitant prices in airport bars by people in Muslim dress.
     
  20. jayman

    jayman Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2004
    13,439
    640
    0
    Location:
    Winnipeg Manitoba
    Vehicle:
    2004 Prius
    Ah, now we're getting to The Ultimate God: the almighty dollar

    Interesting how that buck appears an easy out, a good way to circumvent, even the kookiest of religious rantings.