We should indict Saddam if he is guilty of 9/11 crimes

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(dbermanmd @ Aug 22 2006, 10:27 AM) [snapback]307619[/snapback]</div>

OMG! and Independent Thinker quick "Guardian's of the Left" ATTACK! ATTACK! :lol:

Wildkow

p.s. You will be assimilated. [attachmentid=4594]

 

I suppose we could argue if the shrub is just the most incompetent president ever, or a liar of unprecedented caliber, but I say it little matters. He should be impeached, yesterday.

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Dragonfly @ Aug 22 2006, 05:49 PM) [snapback]307925[/snapback]</div>

Patience, I know it's a difficult concept so I'm trying to put it in the simplest words and the most understandable style possible.

Wildkow

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(EricGo @ Aug 23 2006, 09:04 AM) [snapback]308253[/snapback]</div>

Nope that would have to be Carter. Shamefully I voted for him.

Wildkow

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Wildkow @ Aug 23 2006, 09:11 AM) [snapback]308255[/snapback]</div>

Funny, most people I know loved Carter. Probably the best humanitarian prediedent we've ever had. But if all you care about is money and profit then I could see why you would not like him. Reagan would have been your man lol

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Sufferin' Prius Envy @ Aug 23 2006, 12:13 AM) [snapback]308104[/snapback]</div>

Such negativity.... People are fundamentally the same and most want the same things in life. Its their education on world subjects that changes their opinions and thus their reactions to people of other countries for good or bad. Dumb it down by making fun of those who want peace in the world and try to act all badass but in the eyes of a lot of educated folk your opinions are the saddening ones.

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(triphop @ Aug 22 2006, 11:08 AM) [snapback]307650[/snapback]</div>

I hate that picture but shouldn't you cite the source I would hate to see anyone accuse you of plagiarism or poor netiquette. <_<

Wildkow

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Wildkow @ Aug 23 2006, 11:11 AM) [snapback]308255[/snapback]</div>

Ok, I'm too young to have been politically aware back then, and I've never heard anybody say this before, so my curiosity's up..... What did Carter do that was impeachable?

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(F8L @ Aug 23 2006, 09:19 AM) [snapback]308258[/snapback]</div>

Actually I made much more money under Clinton than Reagan. So to conform to your standards I will switch my vote to Clinton. Also I assume by your characterization of me being a money grubbing righty (I'm actually an independent) that money is of no concern to you? Also being a lefty I'm assuming you disagree with Bush's tax cut? So my question to you is did you keep your tax cut or give it back for the benefit of the poor and downtrodden in the nation?

Wildkow

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Wildkow @ Aug 23 2006, 12:20 PM) [snapback]308262[/snapback]</div>

Wth are you talking about? Go and look-up plagiarism and then come back to post. Netiquette indeed.

PS. Here is a hint - right click on the image and select properties - all questions answered.

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Wildkow @ Aug 23 2006, 11:05 AM) [snapback]308329[/snapback]</div>

Actually i didn't characterize YOU in particular but you seem to have a penchant for taking things personal I guess I can understand.

Money is of concern only in so much as I get what I need. I've had plenty of money in the past and have come to the realization that it is not all its cracked up to be and I am much happier without a bunch of it. Hell I sold my C5 and my T/A for the Prius As far as taxes go they need to be revamped all together and officially decide whats to be done about income taxes since its unconstitutional to REQUIRE citizens to file.

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Wildkow @ Aug 23 2006, 12:11 PM) [snapback]308255[/snapback]</div>

Methinks that you simply cannot find sufficiently credible rationalizations..


<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Dragonfly @ Aug 23 2006, 12:32 PM) [snapback]308270[/snapback]</div>

He spoke truth to the powerful - he said Americans needed to conserve energy.

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Dragonfly @ Aug 23 2006, 09:32 AM) [snapback]308270[/snapback]</div>

So since you are politically aware now and narrowly defining the criteria for determining who was the Worst President I would have to change my vote to Clinton as he was the only Elected President to have been impeached.

Wildkow

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Wildkow @ Aug 23 2006, 02:05 PM) [snapback]308329[/snapback]</div>

As far as questions go - that is a stupid question (yes, there are stupid questions - this a great example of one). A better set of questions are:

Should Americans be getting tax cuts when we are currently in the process of growing the National Debt? (Notice how the debt balloons during recent GOP administrations)



Should Americans be getting tax cuts when we are engaged in two foreign wars?



Should Americas be getting tax cuts when our troops have insufficient equipment





<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE( @ Aug 23 2006, 02:42 PM) [snapback]308358[/snapback]</div>

Maybe in your fantasy land - as far as the real world goes, the articles of impeachment were not passed in the Senate.

But, then, facts are not your strong point. :blink:

Facts, not opinion.

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(triphop @ Aug 23 2006, 03:00 PM) [snapback]308373[/snapback]</div>

Actually, Clinton was impeached. The articles were passed by the House and the trial was held by the Senate.

From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment

We may not agree politically, but Wildkow was right on this one.

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Proco @ Aug 23 2006, 03:18 PM) [snapback]308396[/snapback]</div>

Granted - as much as it pains me to say so! I guess if you post as much as Wildkow does - some are sure to be correct. :lol:

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Wildkow @ Aug 23 2006, 01:42 PM) [snapback]308358[/snapback]</div>

What? I didn't say anything about determining who is the worst President. I was just asking about why you though Carter should be impeached - what did he do that was impeachable. I thought maybe I missed something important. Looks like I misinterpreted your post.

 

I say we have a party -- Wildkow got something right !!
Now, if dberman ever says something approaching factual reality, I'm going to party till drunk.

Btw, it is rather odd, but impeachment at the federal level is a two step process, and the actual jury is the senate where in Clinton's case he was acquited. So he was impeached by the house, and acquited by the senate of all charges.

This makes 'impeached' more akin to 'charged', although I'd guess most people in the street do not understand it this way.

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Wildkow @ Aug 23 2006, 11:11 AM) [snapback]308255[/snapback]</div>

Still waiting.

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Dragonfly @ Aug 23 2006, 01:25 PM) [snapback]308438[/snapback]</div>

Yep you did. The issue was who was the worst president not who should be impeached.

Wildkow

p.s. Come on fly you really have issues with the "World is better off without Saddam" statement or are you arguing that it isn't better off? Try these out, just some quickies off the top of my head. . .

He can no longer invade his neighbor's.
He can no longer cause environmental disasters.
He can no longer use WMD's on anyone.
He can no longer torture, rape and kill his own citizens.
He can no longer support terrorism.

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(triphop @ Aug 22 2006, 11:24 AM) [snapback]307663[/snapback]</div>

Which President has appointed more homosexuals to top government positions?

Wildkow

 

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Wildkow @ Aug 23 2006, 10:15 PM) [snapback]308612[/snapback]</div>

The first three fit the shrub to a tee, but alas not Shussein for lack of WMD. No wait, I forgot. You still haven't come to grips with that bit of reality. You are lagging behind the shrub on that point, and that is pitiful.
The other two, most of the world's dictators.

Perhaps you should make a short list of the countries you do not intend to invade .. today.