1. Attachments are working again! Check out this thread for more details and to report any other bugs.

Why?

Discussion in 'Gen 3 Prius Fuel Economy' started by Launch Vehicle, Jun 20, 2019.

  1. Launch Vehicle

    Launch Vehicle Junior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2010
    82
    6
    0
    Location:
    Missouri
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    III
    We all know that real MPG's in a Prius averages approximately 5 to 6% less
    than what is displayed on our multi-function displays.
    Over the past 10 years, I have owned two Gen III's - both of them 2010's.
    The calculated MPG (MFD/Cons.) ALWAYS goes down as the gas tank empties.
    100% of the time. It virtually never goes the other way.
    You would think that - at 6.3 pounds per gallon of gas - the calculated MPG
    would go UP as the tank loses weight. But it NEVER does.
    Why is that? Are Toyota's Algorithms in need of fixing?
    Am I in need of fixing?
     
    bisco likes this.
  2. bisco

    bisco cookie crumbler

    Joined:
    May 11, 2005
    108,035
    49,113
    0
    Location:
    boston
    Vehicle:
    2012 Prius Plug-in
    Model:
    Plug-in Base
    i have often wondered this. i know that the average gets harder and harder to change as you pile on the miles, but for the life of me, i can't figure out how to get the average to go up from the initial drive after refilling, even with my best p&g technique
     
  3. JimboPalmer

    JimboPalmer Tsar of all the Rushers

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2009
    12,470
    6,862
    2
    Location:
    Greenwood MS USA
    Vehicle:
    2012 Prius v wagon
    Model:
    Three
    I never owned a gen 3, although I have a v.

    Most cars lose a great deal of MPG as weight increases as they regen 0% of the energy they have before braking.
    The Prius recovers some significant % through regen, 30%? So additional weight is not as great a penalty, as regen increases with weight.

    Many of my tanks improve as I drive, my worst MPG is always within the first mile of a new tank. (you are averaging with 0)
     
  4. jb in NE

    jb in NE Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2018
    2,233
    1,596
    0
    Location:
    Nebraska
    Vehicle:
    2018 Prius Prime
    Model:
    Prime Premium
    I think this is because the displayed average is just a "guess", based on a count of injectors firing or some other input. Your driving over the tank likely didn't change at all - we pretty much all develop muscle memory for driving our cars a certain way.

    I rarely pay much attention to the dash display. The real average for that tank (and even this assumes filling the tank to the same level on each refuel) is the calculation of miles/gallons.
     
  5. Raytheeagle

    Raytheeagle Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2016
    11,251
    15,477
    0
    Location:
    Bay Area, California
    Vehicle:
    2019 Prius Prime
    Model:
    Prime Plus
    Here’s an example from a Prime from the last 4 days of commuting:

    2ACA0241-5979-4DA9-AFA2-4808271F3AB4.jpeg

    While we owned a 2010 Gen3 for over 9 years, I never paid much attention to the intermittent effects during the trip measurement. But we averaged around 50 mpg over the 200k miles we owned it, so not bad at all(y).
     
    jb in NE likes this.
  6. jb in NE

    jb in NE Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2018
    2,233
    1,596
    0
    Location:
    Nebraska
    Vehicle:
    2018 Prius Prime
    Model:
    Prime Premium
    Here is a typical mileage graph for one of my cars - tanks vary quite a bit. I don't get too worried about the single low tank - usually it got filled more and this is reflected in the next tank. This graph is over the life of the car, including winter in Nebraska where there is a big mileage hit, long road trips of 5,000 miles, etc.. But rarely are more than a few tanks in a row the same measured mpg. Lifetime average was 42.0 mpg, despite the variability from tank to tank.

    upload_2019-6-20_21-44-44.png
     
    Raytheeagle likes this.
  7. cnc97

    cnc97 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2018
    1,419
    1,526
    38
    Location:
    Evansville, IN
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    Three
    I reset both my trip odos every time I fuel up. Then the first two or three miles the cons number is typically in the toilet. Reason being that the station I use is on a four lane road with a speed limit of 45 mph leaving one direction or climbing a substantial hill going the other. The down side of the hill only drops off 2/3 of the distance you have to climb up, so there is not the gain from gliding down it.

    Now I do see over the course of the tank a slight increase for the first 100 miles, it levels off for about 50 miles. Then I will lose .2 or .3 for the next 70 miles. That has me showing about 1/2 tank. From then to flashing pip, I typically get a gain of .5 or .6 mpg.

    I have watched the fuel sensor PID on my Bluetooth scanner and it doesn’t show any wild swings on the output from the sensor, so it has to be difference in throttle application or some other subconscious action that I’m doing.
     
  8. jb in NE

    jb in NE Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2018
    2,233
    1,596
    0
    Location:
    Nebraska
    Vehicle:
    2018 Prius Prime
    Model:
    Prime Premium
    I don't think it is anything you are doing, I believe it is variability in the estimating algorithm.

    The fuel sensor PID is tank level, correct? Typically that is not a major input to the estimate. Fuel injector pulses is an available inout that is easy for the ECU to process.
     
  9. Salamander_King

    Salamander_King Senior Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2015
    10,964
    8,843
    0
    Location:
    New England
    Vehicle:
    Other Hybrid
    Model:
    N/A
    Are you saying the displayed mpg on MFD always goes down after you pass the half tank? That is not the case for me. I have had latter half of the tank showing both better or worse mpg than the initial half all depending on the driving conditions. Yes, as @bisco pointed out, as you drive more on the same tank of gas, your average is over the longer distance so small change in mpg will not be reflected, but I think I have had plenty of cases that I could get the average mpg to go up after the half tank of gas is gone. It is always true that initial mpg after I reset the trip meter will be the easiest time to achieve high mileage. And if I initially get very high inflated mileage, like what happens when I fill at a gas station at the top of the hill and glide downhill first 3-4 miles, then the mpg will be also downhill from the initial high. But by the time I am done half of the tank, ~250 miles, my average mpg is fairly stable. And even in those situations, I have managed to get the average mpg to go up during the use of remaining half of the tank.

    If your mpg ALWAYS goes down after half tank mark and NEVEr goes up, that must be the way you drive. Your driving condition is somehow always worse during the last half of the tank, but I have no idea why.
     
    #9 Salamander_King, Jun 21, 2019
    Last edited: Jun 21, 2019
    RMB likes this.