1. Attachments are working again! Check out this thread for more details and to report any other bugs.

Help with error codes

Discussion in 'Generation 1 Prius Discussion' started by David White, Jan 9, 2016.

  1. David White

    David White Junior Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2014
    19
    4
    1
    Location:
    Perth, Western Australia
    Vehicle:
    2002 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    I was driving my 2002 Prius yesterday (270k km) after returning from 3 weeks holiday and some dreaded warning lights appeared 10 minutes into my drive as I went over a speed hump.

    Before going on holiday, I asked our house-sitter to drive the car every couple of days however I don't think she drove much because when I started the car the HV battery had only 1/4 charge which I've not seen before. The car started fine and very soon charged to 75% with everything appearing to be working normally until I went over the hump a little fast.

    After getting home I got the following codes from Techstream.
    P3000 (though the hybrid system light didn't appear)
    P3006
    P3017
    C1259 (I read somewhere a regenerative system issue)

    The traction battery voltages looked ok to me as I expected to see bigger differences between cells indicating a problem - though I appreciate there are other factors to assess to understand HV battery health. See attached image [​IMG]

    The 12V auxiliary battery measures 11.48V so I will replace this and see what happens after the codes are cleared.

    I had some unusual incidents almost two years ago when Toyota service advised the car was undriveable with a P3009 code but I suspect they may have been related to a 12v battery issue as when the codes were cleared (which the service shop failed to do) the error didn't come back and the car has been running fine since then. I've also taken advice from the forum and replaced the transaxle fluid and installed a new inverter water pump.

    Given the car's age, irregular driving over the last few weeks and the heat we've been experiencing here, I'm not confident the fix will be as easy as it was last time!

    Thanks in advance for any observations or insights.
     
  2. ChapmanF

    ChapmanF Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2008
    23,278
    15,077
    0
    Location:
    Indiana, USA
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    IV


    The computers in the car talk to each other, so some of the codes you get are just repeated reports of the same problem. For example, P3000 is a code from the HV computer and only means the battery computer has told it there's a problem. C1259 comes from the brake computer, and only means the HV computer told it there's a problem. The P3006 and P3017 are coming straight from the battery ECU and they are telling you what the problem is.

    (The P3000 should have a 3 digit INF code to go with it, which might give you a little more information, but in this case I'd bet a small sum it'll be 123.)

    You can see from the freeze frame "IB main battery" of -1.98 amps that the battery was being gently charged at the time, and under even a gentle charge, module 7 was driven to a conspicuously higher voltage than any of the others, and easily more than 0.3 V above the low ones.

    If you'd like any more confirmation, or to see just how pronounced the problem is, you can follow the troubleshooting steps for P3006 and P3011-3029, on pages DI-330 to DI-330-1 and DI-340 to DI-340-2 in your repair manual. (Those are the page numbers from my 2001 edition; they might be different in yours, especially if they wanted to fix the -1, -2 numbering....)

    -Chap
     
    MDNHW11 and David White like this.
  3. DRACO

    DRACO Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2015
    362
    77
    0
    Location:
    Rancho Palos Verdes, California
    Vehicle:
    2002 Prius
    Model:
    One
    +1, remove the 12v battery and have it tested. Generally 11.48v is a dead battery.

    I concur, block 7 appears to be compromised and cause of the P3006 code, "Uneven Charging..." I would recommend a load and charge test to confirm. You may discover more bad modules.
     
  4. David White

    David White Junior Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2014
    19
    4
    1
    Location:
    Perth, Western Australia
    Vehicle:
    2002 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    Thanks for your analysis Steve, the graph is very helpful to visualise the voltage differences. So I understand the higher voltage of block 7 when the battery is loaded is indicative of the P3017 battery becomes weak flag which will also manifest in it dropping below other cells when accelerating.

    I checked the freeze frame data for the P3006 (Battery levels unusually different) and Block 7 was lowest - 17.14V (0.03V below the next lowest). What I don't understand this was triggered when the SOC was 40% however with a SOC of 60% the voltage of Block 7 is 16.83V ? Seems the wrong way around...

    It's been very hot here recently and the day the codes were recorded the temperature was about 35C / 95F, thus the inside battery temperature of around 50C. The fan was going full bore.

    The link in your sig reminds me that a grid charger might help normalise / prolong the life of the battery.

    I've understood from others here that an auxiliary battery measurement of 11.48v with ignition off is too low for reliable operation - then again I suspect it has been this low for some time.

    Chap, thanks for putting the code reporting relationships into perspective. It can look a little scary at first!

    How come the charge rate is expressed as a negative ie. -1.98 amps? I checked the P3000 INF code and yes it's 123! What does this mean? Thanks also for the reference to the repair manual - I don't have one but seem to remember there are ways to get access to this information online.
     
  5. ChapmanF

    ChapmanF Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2008
    23,278
    15,077
    0
    Location:
    Indiana, USA
    Vehicle:
    2010 Prius
    Model:
    IV
    A module with lower capacity than the rest will always drain to a lower voltage faster than the others when current is flowing out, and fill to a higher voltage faster than the rest when current is flowing in. Sides of the same coin.

    If that is with ignition off and you're sure of no significant loads running at the time, then yes, it does provide something for you to look at another time, but it doesn't have to distract you at the moment. Sometimes if people see a bunch of codes they don't see how to relate to each other, they'll jump straight to the conclusion "oh, my battery voltage must be so low it's making the computers insane". But in my experience it takes a really significant undervoltage for that to happen (overvoltage does it more easily), and your computers are obviously sane and reporting a coherent set of codes exactly the way they are supposed to.

    Simple matter of definition - the engineers chose to define the battery current as positive when it is flowing out of the battery, so negative is when it's flowing in. They had to pick one or the other.

    You'll find all that and more in the manual. :) P3000 is an HV computer code for "battery computer told me something's awry with the battery" and the HV computer has about four different INF codes it can add, to sort of editorialize on why that might be. For example, one of them means "I bet that's because you drove without gas" (the battery computer itself wouldn't know that, but the HV computer has that information so it can put two and two together). 123 is basically the code for "I've got nothing to add, go talk to the battery computer."

    techinfo.toyota.com. There's a $15 paywall, gets you two days to either look up whatever you want, or download so you can have your manuals on your phone or what not at the actual times you need them. If you like your car and have any ideas of keeping it for a while, this can be the best $15 you ever spend on it.

    -Chap
     
    bwilson4web likes this.
  6. DRACO

    DRACO Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2015
    362
    77
    0
    Location:
    Rancho Palos Verdes, California
    Vehicle:
    2002 Prius
    Model:
    One
    The Vets will confirm this, in your initial freeze frame read out I noticed the Max and Min voltage/blocks was not displayed, your ECU code was triggered by the wide range of these readings. Try adding the four settings to your preferences, it will make better sense:

    [​IMG]
     
    David White likes this.
  7. David White

    David White Junior Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2014
    19
    4
    1
    Location:
    Perth, Western Australia
    Vehicle:
    2002 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    Today I took the car for a drive and noticed some abrupt changes to the state of charge as displayed on the MFD from 75% to 25% and then a gradual charge back to 75%, clearly the misbehaving block is creating havoc.

    I noted in your linked post the reference to force charging as part of the process for reconditioning a battery together with grid charging. Somewhere else (can't find it now) you mentioned you've seen force charging normalise an out of range block, much like a grid charge process would. Doesn't happen often but has been noted. You said you need to charge to < 80%, wait 30m and check block voltages.

    I thought I might give this a try - to replicate the HV overcharging routine the car sometimes initiates to rebalance a pack. Incidentally this occurred to my vehicle about 6 weeks ago on my way to work - the first time I'd noticed it. I was worried at the time that the ICE was not shutting down and the fan was going full bore in the back but the end of the day when I drove home everything was back to normal.

    I spent a bit of time today with Techstream force charging to over 60%. The fan went to high speed and I noted battery temperature up around 55C but I'm not sure if I'm hastening the destruction of the battery with all the heat or if there are any other safety issues in pushing it beyond 80%.

    Thanks for the suggestion - a lot easier to see what is going on with these values displayed.
     
  8. David White

    David White Junior Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2014
    19
    4
    1
    Location:
    Perth, Western Australia
    Vehicle:
    2002 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    The comment you made I referred to is here however on rereading it I realize I was probably clutching at straws thinking there might be a quick fix. On going back over the post and thread I understand there's a difference between a failed cell and a deteriorated module.

    It was interesting to read this post again as it clarifies the process to find out where the gremlins are by charging and discharging, recording changes along the way.

    Thanks for the heads up on the fan setting. Next time I'll fire it up at the beginning and wait for some cool weather - another heatwave coming... I'll report back with the results.
     
  9. DRACO

    DRACO Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2015
    362
    77
    0
    Location:
    Rancho Palos Verdes, California
    Vehicle:
    2002 Prius
    Model:
    One
    OP, if you car is in the sun, I suggest shading the rear window but making sure the intake ports for the HV battery are not obstructed in anyway. They are the two vent screens at the center seat area between the head rests. Sucking in hot air will not help :-(
     
  10. David White

    David White Junior Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2014
    19
    4
    1
    Location:
    Perth, Western Australia
    Vehicle:
    2002 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    Here's the results of a test I did a few days ago. After seeing how effective a graph can be to visualise what's going on, I decided to plot the voltages from a forced charge above 80% as detailed in the link in Steve's first reply. I tried to go through the discharge process but the car complained and the SOC readings weren't making sense anyway. The sudden change of charge state as seen in the last reading seemed to happen for no reason. It would appear Block 7 is pretty unstable and is causing havoc - I guess this confirms it's toast and needs to be replaced. The question is - are the other blocks ok?

    [​IMG]

    After reading the great stories by S Keith and Draco about their battery refurbishment experiences, I'm keen to tackle it also. My challenge will be to find a suitable donor cell or cells - there are so few Gen 1's here I'll be very lucky to find anything. I'm thinking I will also purchase a grid charger to assist with leveling the cells and modules - I can also use it to keep our Gen 2 in good shape.
     
  11. bwilson4web

    bwilson4web BMW i3 and Model 3

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2005
    27,124
    15,389
    0
    Location:
    Huntsville AL
    Vehicle:
    2018 Tesla Model 3
    Model:
    Prime Plus
    Heat is the enemy and the failing module would have heat-stressed the adjacent modules. They may be OK today but fail in the future. Plan on three modules.

    GOOD LUCK!
    Bob Wilson
     
  12. S Keith

    S Keith Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2015
    799
    327
    0
    Location:
    AZ
    Vehicle:
    2003 Prius
    You have two clusters of behavior there. The group that drops lower than the other is of note. Your spread goes from 0.2V to 0.5V or so. If that corresponds to a heavy load, it's not substantial, but it's definitely curious how you have two distinct groups. I would expect the next module failure to come from the lower group.

    In 2 Gen2 packs, 56 modules, I had 46 good modules. That leaves 8 spare modules following the rebuild with Gen2 cells. If you plan to keep the car for a long while, that's probably the best way to go - better modules with better availability for future issues.

    Module replacement coupled with grid charge/deep discharge could buy you a lot of time.

    I guess it all comes down to how much time and $ you want to invest. :)
     
  13. DRACO

    DRACO Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2015
    362
    77
    0
    Location:
    Rancho Palos Verdes, California
    Vehicle:
    2002 Prius
    Model:
    One
    +1 be ready for 3-4 cell replacement. Better to have them and not need them.

    After the tear down, you will get a better idea of which cells are dead or on it's way out.

    I highly recommend a new bus bar with sensors.
     
  14. David White

    David White Junior Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2014
    19
    4
    1
    Location:
    Perth, Western Australia
    Vehicle:
    2002 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    Thanks for all your suggestions and help so far. As mentioned earlier, the big challenge has been finding modules to replace a failed one in block 7 and possibly others on the way out. Following a lot of fruitless searching locally and online and after considering options of importing a few modules from the US, I discovered a wrecker on the east coast with a 2002 sandwiched by a car on top with a battery for sale. Disregarding a lot of negative google feedback about the operator, I bought the battery for $170 and after some shipping delays it has finally arrived.

    Before opening it up I noticed it had a Primearth EV Energy label instead of Panasonic EV as on the original. I checked online and read that Toyota's JV with Panasonic was renamed in 2010 so possibly a much younger pack? Taking off the cover it certainly looked clean with good seals and without electrolyte splatter I'd noticed on the inside surfaces of the original. I was even more surprised to see very little corrosion and no signs of electrolyte leaking at the terminals or any of the sticky gunk! Perhaps an improved terminal seal? Then a test of all the modules - surprise surprise - every one of them 7.59V!

    [​IMG]

    So it looks like I've jagged a new-ish Gen 1 pack. A week ago, I received Hybrid Automotive's grid charger and I've been very keen to fire it up. I was thinking I'd be replacing modules in my original pack and running through the reconditioning process with the grid charger. Now it looks like all I need to do is some minimal cleaning of bus bars, reassembly and grid charging / reconditioning. I wonder if it would be necessary to load test modules or do other checks to minimise complications?
     
    #14 David White, Feb 22, 2016
    Last edited: Feb 22, 2016
    bwilson4web likes this.
  15. DRACO

    DRACO Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2015
    362
    77
    0
    Location:
    Rancho Palos Verdes, California
    Vehicle:
    2002 Prius
    Model:
    One
    Just be very careful with those sensor tabs on the bus bar, very thin and brittle. If you find a crack, replace it it will give false readings. Yes, those batteries are super clean :D, Congrats.
     
  16. David White

    David White Junior Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2014
    19
    4
    1
    Location:
    Perth, Western Australia
    Vehicle:
    2002 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    Yes, I discovered how flimsy the sensor tabs were when cleaning the bus bars on the original pack. While I only saw corrosion on one sensor tab, getting them out of the plastic housing was tricky with glue everywhere and plastic barbs holding the thin wire in place. I broke one and another was corroded so ended up crimping a couple of connectors on which I bought at an electronics shop.

    I've noticed in the newer battery the plastic barbs are omitted so getting the sensor tabs out shouldn't be so difficult. Since I've already cleaned up the original pack's bus bars, I think I'll swap over the copper plates so the job should be a bit easier!
     
    DRACO and bwilson4web like this.
  17. David White

    David White Junior Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2014
    19
    4
    1
    Location:
    Perth, Western Australia
    Vehicle:
    2002 Prius
    Model:
    N/A
    Draco - wanted to thank you for a post which I can't find just now about using the rejuvenation mode of your 12V charger on your battery. Reminded me that my charger does this too, so I did the 24 hour routine and found it significantly improved afterwards. What was a borderline battery (11.48V measured with a light on in the trunk), is now 12.7V after being disconnected for more than a day. I'll keep an eye on it but so far so good.

    After charging the new HV battery with Hybrid Automotive's grid charger for around 18 hours, I fitted it back into the car today and started it up. Nice to see the lights gone and the car driving well - for a few minutes... the lights came back - yikes! So out with the laptop and Techstream to discover P3191 engine does not start.

    Thanks to the many questions and answers here about this I learn it may be fuel / throttle body / spark plug related and notice the engine does start after resetting the code by disconnecting the battery. So maybe a symptom of sitting around for 6 weeks (and possibly in need of new plugs / throttle clean!) I did a bit of driving to see if the problem went away and it seems to have with that and some fresh fuel in the tank so planning a longer drive tomorrow.

    When I'm comfortable the gremlins have been ironed out I'll do a discharge test as described by S Keith to see what shape the battery is in and report back.
     
  18. DRACO

    DRACO Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2015
    362
    77
    0
    Location:
    Rancho Palos Verdes, California
    Vehicle:
    2002 Prius
    Model:
    One
    Outstanding!

    Yes please post back. For the P3191 MAF sensor, just make sure the connector "clicks" in if you cleaned it, clean it again with MAF cleaner and let it dry thoroughly or even over night. A disconnected or loose MAF will not allow you to start the car.

    My MIL reports all is still good with her car :) I will take another health reading soon and report back.

    Cheers!

    Jim
     
  19. bwilson4web

    bwilson4web BMW i3 and Model 3

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2005
    27,124
    15,389
    0
    Location:
    Huntsville AL
    Vehicle:
    2018 Tesla Model 3
    Model:
    Prime Plus
    Clean the throttle body.

    Bob Wilson
     
  20. ericbecky

    ericbecky Hybrid Battery Hero

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2004
    4,365
    3,209
    1
    Location:
    Madison, Wisconsin
    Vehicle:
    2005 Prius
    Model:
    Two
    Did you take any top-view pictures of the modules?
    If you have some pics of the serial numbers, the date code could be identified.